1995
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.109.5.874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned diminution of the unconditioned response in rabbit eyeblink conditioning: Identifying neural substrates in the cerebellum and brainstem.

Abstract: Several models of Pavlovian conditioning assume that processing of an unconditioned stimulus (US) is diminished by a conditioned stimulus (CS) with which it had been paired. Two experiments evaluated the hypothesis that US processing may be diminished by CS-dependent activation of the cerebellum. Experiment 1 showed that electrical brain stimulation (EBS) of the cerebellar interpositus nucleus diminished the peak amplitude of the rabbit's unconditioned eyeblink response. This effect was bilateral, was systemat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
4
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Because shock conditions fear proportional to its painfulness, an analgesic CR would undermine the reinforcing effectiveness of the US. Such a finding is also consistent with the reduction in the UR that frequently accompanies conditioning (Fanselow 1984;Canli and Donegan 1995). Additionally, pharmacological antagonism of endogenous opioids prevents error correction (Fanselow 1986a).…”
Section: The Rescorla-wagner Modelsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Because shock conditions fear proportional to its painfulness, an analgesic CR would undermine the reinforcing effectiveness of the US. Such a finding is also consistent with the reduction in the UR that frequently accompanies conditioning (Fanselow 1984;Canli and Donegan 1995). Additionally, pharmacological antagonism of endogenous opioids prevents error correction (Fanselow 1986a).…”
Section: The Rescorla-wagner Modelsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…In contrast to the anticipatory response, the response to the threat is an innate and automatic reaction that does not require learning. However, as described above, learning-related changes in the response to threat frequently develop during conditioning (Canli, Detmer, & Donegan, 1992; Canli & Donegan, 1995; Domjan, 2005; Dunsmoor et al, 2008; Knight et al, 2011; Knight et al, 2010; Wood, Kuykendall, Ver Hoef, & Knight, 2013; Wood, Ver Hoef, & Knight, 2012). Conditioned diminution of the emotional response to threat is a reduction in the emotional response to a threat that is predictable (e.g., preceded by the warning signal) compared to a threat that is unpredictable (e.g., presented alone or preceded by a safety signal).…”
Section: Conditioned Diminution Of the Emotional Response To Threatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to CRs, the unconditioned response (UCR) produced by the UCS is typically considered an unlearned response that is reflexively expressed. However, learning-related changes in the magnitude of the UCR have been observed in prior conditioning research (Baxter, 1966;Canli & Donegan, 1995;Dunsmoor, Bandettini, & Knight, 2008;Knight, Waters, King, & Bandettini, 2010;Rust, 1976). This prior work has demonstrated that UCR amplitude can be enhanced or attenuated (see Domjan, 2005, for review).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This prior work has demonstrated that UCR amplitude can be enhanced or attenuated (see Domjan, 2005, for review). For example, an enhanced response is observed during fear-potentiated startle (Cook, Davis, Hawk, Spence, & Gautier, 1992; Grillon, Ameli, Woods, Merikangas, & Davis, 1991; Vrana, Spence, & Lang, 1988), whereas eyeblink and skin conductance response (SCR) conditioning studies have typically observed an attenuation of the UCR (Baxter, 1966; Canli & Donegan, 1995; Dunsmoor et al, 2008; Kimmel, 1967; Knight et al, 2010; Rust, 1976). This conditioned attenuation of the UCR is often referred to as UCR diminution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%