1996
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.22.1.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned stimulus determinants of conditioned response form in Pavlovian fear conditioning.

Abstract: Four experiments using barpress conditioned suppression in rats found that tone evoked more freezing (immobility) than did light. Still, tone and light appeared to have similar conditioned value as assessed by suppression in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, and by blocking, second-order conditioning, and overconditioning assays in Experiments 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Experiment 4 arranged for tone to evoke less suppression than light but more freezing. Results suggest that in fear conditioning, the nature of the con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although higher baseline freezing levels were seen after conditioning with light cues as expected [28,29], mice lacking adult neurogenesis froze less than wild types in the ambiguous fear condition but not in the reliable fear condition (S3 Fig). Unconditioned responses to initial presentations of tone, light, and shock were similar in both genotypes, indicating normal sensitivity to the cue and shock in mice lacking adult neurogenesis (S4A–S4D Fig).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Although higher baseline freezing levels were seen after conditioning with light cues as expected [28,29], mice lacking adult neurogenesis froze less than wild types in the ambiguous fear condition but not in the reliable fear condition (S3 Fig). Unconditioned responses to initial presentations of tone, light, and shock were similar in both genotypes, indicating normal sensitivity to the cue and shock in mice lacking adult neurogenesis (S4A–S4D Fig).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Thus, distinct processes must mediate the conditioned responses of freezing and suppression. This conclusion is also supported by behavioral evidence demonstrating that visual CSs, which elicit less freezing than auditory CSs, cause more suppression that auditory CSs (Kim et al 1996). This does not imply that suppression is a poor index of fear, rather, it suggests that suppression may be a distinct conditioned response to fear-eliciting stimuli.…”
Section: Pag Lesions and Suppressionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The observed absence of freezing to the light distractor cannot be explained by the poor associability of the light to the shock. Previous studies have shown that light can serve as a CS in fear conditioning experiments (32). In a separate study involving 24 animals, we confirmed that the flashing light stimulus (in the absence of a tone) was able to acquire CS properties, in a delay fear conditioning procedure (percent time spent freezing to light Ϯ SEM: Delay conditioning, 64 Ϯ 8.76%; Shock-only, 4.89 Ϯ 2.95%, P Ͻ 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%