1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-0102(95)00875-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioned taste aversion in rats with excitotoxic brain lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

12
143
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
12
143
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the -6 -amount of Sac intakes gradually increased toward the 3rd test day (D3: 5.9 ± 1.5 ml) as shown in previously reports [3,5,6,10,15,33]. When CS was paired with saline instead of LiCl, CTA was never induced, and rather significant increase of Sac intake was observed on the 2nd to 3rd test day rather than decreaseas shown in our previous paper [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the -6 -amount of Sac intakes gradually increased toward the 3rd test day (D3: 5.9 ± 1.5 ml) as shown in previously reports [3,5,6,10,15,33]. When CS was paired with saline instead of LiCl, CTA was never induced, and rather significant increase of Sac intake was observed on the 2nd to 3rd test day rather than decreaseas shown in our previous paper [15].…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…The association between the CS and the US can proceed under deep anesthesia induced by pentobarbital or ketamine when hypnotic doses of these anesthetics are administrated after CS-presentation, or subhypnotic doses of them, which do not impair drinking, was applied before CS-presentation [6,33].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other structures that have been implicated in the formation of a CTA include the hypothalamus (Roth et al, 1973), basal forebrain (Lopez-Garcia et al, 1993) and potentially the noradrenergic system (Dunn and Everitt, 1987). Lesions of the hippocampus impact CTA only mildly, or not at all (Best and Orr, 1973, Murphy and Brown, 1974, Yamamoto et al, 1995. Therefore, CTA appears to be an ideal paradigm for evaluating non-spatial forms of learning, not dependent on hippocampal function, in mouse models of AD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have reported that VPMpc-lesioned animals retain a normal concentration response to preferred and non-preferred tastes [134][135][136][137] but may have disrupted [137], impaired [127,130] or else have no effects on CTA [134,135,138,139]. Current views suggest a role in comparing novel and familiar tastes [140] in more complex gustatory learning tasks or in attention to gustatory function [135,136,141].…”
Section: The Gustatory System In the Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lesions on either the medial or lateral parts of the nucleus disrupt taste preference [120,124], selective neophobia [125,126], sodium appetite [127,128] and CTA [121,[126][127][128][129][130].…”
Section: The Gustatory System In the Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%