2019
DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(19)30023-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditioning with busulfan plus melphalan versus melphalan alone before autologous haemopoietic cell transplantation for multiple myeloma: an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
5
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, it has been used for myeloablative-conditioning regimens before stem cell transplantation. 12,13,23 Busulfan was used to produce the small intestine mucositis animal model in current investigation because it causes mucositis in patients. [12][13][14] Many investigations have attempted to reduce chemotherapy-induced intestinal disruption by using prebiotics, probiotics, selenium, volatile oils, and others, 1,2,24,25 however, these efforts have not been successful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it has been used for myeloablative-conditioning regimens before stem cell transplantation. 12,13,23 Busulfan was used to produce the small intestine mucositis animal model in current investigation because it causes mucositis in patients. [12][13][14] Many investigations have attempted to reduce chemotherapy-induced intestinal disruption by using prebiotics, probiotics, selenium, volatile oils, and others, 1,2,24,25 however, these efforts have not been successful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qazilbash et al reported results of a phase 3 study comparing Bu-Mel versus melphalan alone in NDMM patients. 8 The Bu-Mel group had significantly longer PFS than melphalan alone even in patients with high-risk cytogenetics (median PFS 64.7 vs 43.5 months, P = .022 and not reached (NR) versus 25 months, P = .0087 in all patients and highrisk cytogenetics patients, respectively). Importantly, intravenous busulfan did not increase the risk of sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS).…”
Section: High Dose Melphalan: Are There Any Alternatives To Improvementioning
confidence: 86%
“…Furthermore, the addition of bortezomib to the high dose melphalan conditioning regimen did not improve outcomes [76]. However, a recent phase 3 clinical trial evaluating the addition of busulfan in the conditioning setting showed that busulfan followed by melphalan at 140 mg/m 2 resulted in a prolonged PFS of 64.7 months compared with 43.5 months with melphalan at 200 mg/m 2 alone (p = 0.022) [77]. Therefore, this combination regimen may become the new standard of care in the near future.…”
Section: Mobilization and Conditioning Regimensmentioning
confidence: 99%