2005
DOI: 10.1080/01425690500199842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conditions of domination: reflections on harms generated by the British state education system

Abstract: Education in Britain increasingly appears to serve a very narrow notion of pedagogy, partly reflecting the ‘conditions of domination' generated by the rise of the new managerialism in the delivery of public services. In the name of economy, efficiency and effectiveness, social progress is increasingly seen to lie in achieving continual increases in ‘productivity', realised through giving management the absolute freedom to arrange its resources in whatever way it feels appropriate. At the heart of this critical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can see in what both the working-class boys and girls say some of the hidden injuries of class (Sennett and Cobb, 1972) that are enshrined and perpetuated through educational policy. Particularly stark is the damage generated by the increasing surveillance and regulation of pupils' learning, enacted through testing and assessment practices (Beckmann and Cooper, 2005). There has been a long history of regulative and interventionist education assessment policy which claims to be aimed at raising the achievement of working-class children (David, 1993;Tomlinson, 2001;Vincent and Warren, 1999).…”
Section: Theme 3 (Participation) -Participation In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can see in what both the working-class boys and girls say some of the hidden injuries of class (Sennett and Cobb, 1972) that are enshrined and perpetuated through educational policy. Particularly stark is the damage generated by the increasing surveillance and regulation of pupils' learning, enacted through testing and assessment practices (Beckmann and Cooper, 2005). There has been a long history of regulative and interventionist education assessment policy which claims to be aimed at raising the achievement of working-class children (David, 1993;Tomlinson, 2001;Vincent and Warren, 1999).…”
Section: Theme 3 (Participation) -Participation In Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process has been characterised by policy overload and contradictions, or ‘Policy ADHD’ (Thomson, ). Policy changes have been implicated in causing, or at least compounding, direct and indirect psychological harm to children and communities (Ball, ; Beckmann & Cooper, ; Hargreaves, ). The government's drive to raise standards, increase efficiency and effectiveness has taken its toll on teacher health and morale and also challenged teachers’ identities (Day et al, ; Hargreaves, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alexander 2007). Critics have cited a number of problems: the plateau reached by students' performance against key educational indicators (Tymms and Merrell 2007); continuing disaffection on the part of students, particularly disadvantaged students (Beckmann and Cooper 2005); teacher (and parent) dissatisfaction with a test-driven system (Woods et al 1997); and, importantly for CP, lack of innovative capacity (Bentley and Selzer 1999).…”
Section: A New Policy Settlement?mentioning
confidence: 98%