1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.54.4885
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conduction- and valence-band offsets at the hydrogenated amorphous silicon-carbon/crystalline silicon interface via capacitance techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all these test structures, a 40 nm thick µc-Si:H layer grown with high hydrogen dilution warrants a low tunnelling resistance to the ZnO back contact. If we identify E a with the valence band offset ∆E V between the c-Si wafer and the (i) a-Si:H interlayer this result corresponds reasonably well to the band offset data reported earlier [2][3][4][5]. After a deposition time of t dep = 30 s we obtain for both types of contacts resistances R < 10 -2 Ωcm 2 , i.e., values that are very well suited for a low-ohmic back contact in a solar cell.…”
Section: Heterojunction C-si / (I) A-sisupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In all these test structures, a 40 nm thick µc-Si:H layer grown with high hydrogen dilution warrants a low tunnelling resistance to the ZnO back contact. If we identify E a with the valence band offset ∆E V between the c-Si wafer and the (i) a-Si:H interlayer this result corresponds reasonably well to the band offset data reported earlier [2][3][4][5]. After a deposition time of t dep = 30 s we obtain for both types of contacts resistances R < 10 -2 Ωcm 2 , i.e., values that are very well suited for a low-ohmic back contact in a solar cell.…”
Section: Heterojunction C-si / (I) A-sisupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Published values are unfortunately widely spread [1][2][3][4], and mostly based on optical measurements; doubts have been expressed about their validity to be used in order to explain electrical phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…% normally found in glow discharge deposited a-Si:H increases the optical gap of the amorphous semiconductor. 40 It is therefore reasonable that the hydrogen rich shell surrounding the silicon nanocrystal has a bandgap of approximately 2.0 eV. This is admittedly a rough estimate, but the exact value of the energy gap of the hydrogen rich shell surrounding the nanocrystal is not crucial for the argument below.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When the crystal fraction is 0.10, the dangling bond density as determined by the midgap optical absorption coefficient is ϳ3 ϫ 10 18 cm −3 , compared to roughly 10 17 cm −3 for the film with X c = 0.02 crystal fraction. 40 However, if 10% of the mixed-phase material is crystalline, then with nanoparticles of diameter ϳ5 nm, this implies a density of nanocrystalline inclusions of ϳ10 18 cm −3 . Consequently, the excess charges donated by these inclusions would not be sufficient to maintain the dark Fermi level at its position closer to the conduction band edge ͓see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%