Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy 2017
DOI: 10.1002/9783527699773.ch9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductive Atomic Force Microscopy for Nanolithography Based on Local Anodic Oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although conductive AFM (c-AFM) is a suitable method to measure the electrical properties of individual structures [14], it is very time consuming and it cannot be used to characterize complete integrated circuits. Nevertheless, the methodology that we present here is interesting for contacting single pillars in complex integrated circuits, in combination with standard fabrication methods.…”
Section: Contacting By Afm Nano-indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conductive AFM (c-AFM) is a suitable method to measure the electrical properties of individual structures [14], it is very time consuming and it cannot be used to characterize complete integrated circuits. Nevertheless, the methodology that we present here is interesting for contacting single pillars in complex integrated circuits, in combination with standard fabrication methods.…”
Section: Contacting By Afm Nano-indentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) measurements were conducted in the dark to study the local surface potential of the films (Figure S12). The contact potential difference (CPD) refers to the potential difference between the surface of the sample being tested and the probe, which denoted as CPD = W tip W sample e , where W tip and W sample represent the work function (WF) of the tip and the sample, respectively . By subtracting the measured CPD value from the tip’s work function, the work function of the sample can be estimated. , As shown in the insets of Figure d–f, the line profile of the films indicates an increase of CPD values from 330 to 540 and then to 600 mV for the control, PHPA, and PHPA+PFOA film, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where W tip and W sample represent the work function (WF) of the tip and the sample, respectively. 39 By subtracting the measured CPD value from the tip's work function, the work function of the sample can be estimated. 40,41 As shown in the insets of Figure 2d−f, the line profile of the films indicates an increase of CPD values from 330 to 540 and then to 600 mV for the control, PHPA, and PHPA+PFOA film, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%