2013
DOI: 10.1155/2013/741248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conductivity-Dependent Strain Response of Carbon Nanotube Treated Bacterial Nanocellulose

Abstract: This paper reports the strain sensitivity of flexible, electrically conductive, and nanostructured cellulose which was prepared by modification of bacterial cellulose with double-walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). The electrical conductivity depends on the modifying agent and its dispersion process. The conductivity of the samples obtained from bacterial cellulose (BNC) pellicles modified with DWCNT was in the range from 0.034 S·cm−1to 0.39 S·cm−1, and for BNC pellicles… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors found that the strain sensitivity of the fabricated conductive BCs depends on their conductivity and increases upon increasing the conductivity of samples, so that MWCNT/BC with high conductivity shows higher strain sensitivity than DWCNT/BC. 97 Wang versatility, high abundance, flexibility and low cost offered by a porous matrix. 2,133,[141][142][143][144][145] On the other hand, conventional paper also carries some drawbacks such as large surface roughness, optical opaqueness, low mechanicalstrength and low stability in water, which may hinder its broad integration into (opto)electronic devices and sensors.…”
Section: Ncs In Optical (Bio)sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that the strain sensitivity of the fabricated conductive BCs depends on their conductivity and increases upon increasing the conductivity of samples, so that MWCNT/BC with high conductivity shows higher strain sensitivity than DWCNT/BC. 97 Wang versatility, high abundance, flexibility and low cost offered by a porous matrix. 2,133,[141][142][143][144][145] On the other hand, conventional paper also carries some drawbacks such as large surface roughness, optical opaqueness, low mechanicalstrength and low stability in water, which may hinder its broad integration into (opto)electronic devices and sensors.…”
Section: Ncs In Optical (Bio)sensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, meaning that severe agglomerations of MWCNTs exist, which significantly lower the electrical conductivity compared to composites consisting of a fullnetworked CNT/polymer composites [43][44][45]. Note that when the volume fraction of the MWCNTs is high, say 1.0 % in Figure 9, the experimental result is much lower than the prediction due to severe agglomeration of MWCNTs, which has been commonly found in the literature [39,46].…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Furthermore, all BC films exhibit significant piezoelectric response (5.0–20 pC N −1 ), allowing BC to be used as a sensing material 85. Farjana et al86 fabricated conductive BC films (thickness of 25–65 µm) by modifying the BC pellicles with double‐walled carbon nanotubes (DWCNTs) and multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs), which can be used as strain sensors.…”
Section: D Nanocellulose‐based Products For Sensor Designmentioning
confidence: 99%