2016
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone Beam CT vs. Fan Beam CT: A Comparison of Image Quality and Dose Delivered Between Two Differing CT Imaging Modalities

Abstract: A comparison of image quality and dose delivered between two differing computed tomography (CT) imaging modalities—fan beam and cone beam—was performed. A literature review of quantitative analyses for various image quality aspects such as uniformity, signal-to-noise ratio, artifact presence, spatial resolution, modulation transfer function (MTF), and low contrast resolution was generated. With these aspects quantified, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) shows a superior spatial resolution to that of fan bea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
93
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a direct comparison is deteriorated by the fact that our test set consists of more than 80% of CBCT scans, whereas the ones presented in literature use only CT scans. Typically, the image quality is worse in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio in CBCT scans compared to CT scans [25], making the segmentation more challenging. The decreased image quality is further likely to increase the interobserver variability, as seen in the comparison between two different CT modalities and MRI [18].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a direct comparison is deteriorated by the fact that our test set consists of more than 80% of CBCT scans, whereas the ones presented in literature use only CT scans. Typically, the image quality is worse in terms of contrast-to-noise ratio in CBCT scans compared to CT scans [25], making the segmentation more challenging. The decreased image quality is further likely to increase the interobserver variability, as seen in the comparison between two different CT modalities and MRI [18].…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of CBCT is mainly due to a relatively low radiation dose [11], limited metal artefacts [12], high spatial resolution (0.075-0.4 mm isotropic voxel) [13], and low maintenance and operating costs [14]. Nevertheless, CBCT is not used for contrast-enhanced examinations, does not have a high contrast resolution [15], and the scan time is long with non-negligible motion artefacts [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of IV contrast did help with identification of blood vessels within the head and neck region. Although gross soft tissue structures, including large lymph nodes and blood vessels, could be identified, the microCT scans had a much superior soft tissue definition [17]. Furthermore, our CBCT machine is one of the earliest generation scanners (built in 2002).…”
Section: Intraoperative Imaging With Cone Beam Ctmentioning
confidence: 99%