2016
DOI: 10.1139/cgj-2016-0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone penetration test (CPT)-based soil behaviour type (SBT) classification system — an update

Abstract: A soil classification system is used to group soils according to shared qualities or characteristics based on simple cost-effective tests. The most common soil classification systems used in geotechnical engineering are based on physical (textural) characteristics such as grain size and plasticity. Ideally, geotechnical engineers would also like to classify soils based on behaviour characteristics that have a strong link to fundamental in situ behaviour. However, existing textural-based classification systems … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
237
0
63

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 315 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
9
237
0
63
Order By: Relevance
“…Piezocone data from reference sites (without GH), GH‐bearing sites, and calcareous cemented clay (after Robertson, ) plotted in: (a) Q tn − U 2 chart and (b) Q tn − Fr chart (Robertson, ). Data from GH‐bearing sites are represented by pink crosses where the GH content could not have been estimated and by different symbols and colors referring to estimates of GH content (i.e., S hmin , see legend).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piezocone data from reference sites (without GH), GH‐bearing sites, and calcareous cemented clay (after Robertson, ) plotted in: (a) Q tn − U 2 chart and (b) Q tn − Fr chart (Robertson, ). Data from GH‐bearing sites are represented by pink crosses where the GH content could not have been estimated and by different symbols and colors referring to estimates of GH content (i.e., S hmin , see legend).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Robertson [3] soils with K* g > 330 tend to have significant microstructure and the higher the value of K* g , the more microstructure is likely present. Hence, the soil with K* g > 330 can be classified as structured soil where traditional generalized CPT-based empirical correlations may have less reliability and where local modification may be needed [3]. Key classification parameters obtained in this study are shown in …”
Section: Soil Profile At the Test Sitementioning
confidence: 92%
“…The U 2 parameter represents the ratio of the generated pore pressure (the increase of pore pressure above static value) and the effective vertical pressure of soil. Robertson suggested a new Q tn -I G chart (Figure 3, right) to identify soils with microstructure, where I G is the small-strain rigidity index (I G = G o /(q t -σ v )) [3]. In this chart soils with microstructure are plotted on the right side of the K* g = 330 limit.…”
Section: Soil Profile At the Test Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article, results of three cone penetration tests executed at three construction sites in the city of Salzburg are discussed by means of existing soil behaviour type charts. Since the most familiar charts for practical engineering were developed for unstructured soils, Schneider et al [3] and Robertson [2] defined new correlations, which allow the detection of a possible microstructure. The following studies try to evaluate the presence of microstructural bonds in sedimentary deposits such as the Salzburger Seeton by using the mentioned correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%