2010 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2010.5653014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cone-restricted kernel subspace methods

Abstract: We propose cone-restricted kernel subspace methods for pattern classification. A cone is mathematically defined in a manner similar to a linear subspace with a nonnegativity constraint. Since the angles between vectors (i.e., inner products) are fundamental to the cone, kernel tricks can be directly applied. The proposed methods approximate the distribution of sample patterns by using the cone in kernel feature space via kernel tricks, and the classification is more accurate than that of the kernel subspace me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This characteristic does not allow the combination of CNN features with negative coefficients; accordingly, a set of CNN features forms a convex cone instead of a subspace in a high dimensional vector space, as described in Sec.II-C. For example, it is well known that a set of front-facing images under various illumination conditions forms a convex cone, referred to as an illumination cone [16], [17]. Several previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of convex cone representation compared with subspace representation [18], [19]. These advantages naturally motivated us to replace a subspace with a convex cone in models of a set of CNN features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This characteristic does not allow the combination of CNN features with negative coefficients; accordingly, a set of CNN features forms a convex cone instead of a subspace in a high dimensional vector space, as described in Sec.II-C. For example, it is well known that a set of front-facing images under various illumination conditions forms a convex cone, referred to as an illumination cone [16], [17]. Several previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of convex cone representation compared with subspace representation [18], [19]. These advantages naturally motivated us to replace a subspace with a convex cone in models of a set of CNN features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that the positive charges on surface of the jet can efficiently drive the PBIEM segments with bromoester moiety to the fiber surface. To obtain "shortened nanofibers", water/hexane mixture was used as disperse medium to preserve the electrospun nanofibers in excellent suspension within the interface [3]. Cooling the system with an ice-water bath leads to enhance the cutting efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The illumination cone is a more strict representation than the illumination subspace mentioned above. Several previous studies have demonstrated the advantages of convex cone representation compared with subspace representation (Kobayashi and Otsu, 2008;Kobayashi et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2017Wang et al, , 2018. These advantages naturally motivated us to replace a subspace with a convex cone in models for a set of CNN features including the types of features with non-negative constraint.…”
Section: Cnnmentioning
confidence: 99%