Abstract:Adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors containing cone-specific promoters have rescued cone photoreceptor function in mouse and dog models of achromatopsia, but cone-specific promoters have not been optimized for use in primates. Using AAV vectors administered by subretinal injection, we evaluated a series of promoters based on the human L-opsin promoter, or a chimeric human cone transducin promoter, for their ability to drive gene expression of green fluorescent protein (GFP) in mice and nonhuman primates. Each… Show more
“…Three weeks after subretinal injections, retinal cross-sections were stained with cone arrestin, and GFP expression was examined ( Figure 1, A-C). We found GFP expression in both rod and cone photoreceptors with mCAR promoter, while PR2.1 and PR1.7 led to strong expression mostly in cones, as reported previously (18,19). Using the same vectors, we obtained strikingly different expression patterns after intravitreal delivery (Figure 1, D-F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, we found a chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor I (COUP-TFI) binding site within this 337-bp sequence (Supplemental Table 1). COUP-TFI has been shown to suppress green opsin gene (Opn1mw) expression in the mouse retina (22) and might thus be accountable for lower expression with the PR2.1 promoter in macaque cones when AAV is delivered subretinally as previously shown (18). Within the same specific 337-bp region, we also found multiple binding sites for generic, ubiquitous activator TFs ( Figure 2B and Supplemental Table 1), such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (CEBPB) and general transcription factor II-I (GTF2I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Specific targeting of cone cells has never been attempted using vitreally administered AAV. In order to find suitable promoter sequences for restricted gene expression in cones applicable in the clinic, we focused on promoters that have previously been validated in either nonhuman primate (NHP) (18) or human tissue (4). We generated AAV2-7m8 vectors encoding GFP under the control of mouse cone arrestin (mCAR), PR2.1 and PR1.7 promoters (synthetic promoters based on the human red opsin gene enhancer and promoter sequences -their size is equal to 2.1 and 1.7 kilobases, respectively) and injected them at equal titers into eyes of 6-week-old WT mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we analyzed transcription factor (TF) binding sites within each promoter sequence using bioinformatics (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). The present analysis aimed to answer the following questions: (i) why is PR1.7 more efficient than PR2.1 in cones (18), and (ii) why do PR2.1 and mCAR promoters lead to off-target expression after intravitreal administration? We hypothesized that the differential expression patterns observed between PR1.7 and PR2.1 are due to additional TF binding sites found in the 337-bp sequence located in the 5′ region of the PR2.1 promoter but not in the PR1.7 promoter (Figure 2, A and B).…”
“…Three weeks after subretinal injections, retinal cross-sections were stained with cone arrestin, and GFP expression was examined ( Figure 1, A-C). We found GFP expression in both rod and cone photoreceptors with mCAR promoter, while PR2.1 and PR1.7 led to strong expression mostly in cones, as reported previously (18,19). Using the same vectors, we obtained strikingly different expression patterns after intravitreal delivery (Figure 1, D-F).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Interestingly, we found a chicken ovalbumin upstream promoter-transcription factor I (COUP-TFI) binding site within this 337-bp sequence (Supplemental Table 1). COUP-TFI has been shown to suppress green opsin gene (Opn1mw) expression in the mouse retina (22) and might thus be accountable for lower expression with the PR2.1 promoter in macaque cones when AAV is delivered subretinally as previously shown (18). Within the same specific 337-bp region, we also found multiple binding sites for generic, ubiquitous activator TFs ( Figure 2B and Supplemental Table 1), such as CCAAT/enhancer binding protein β (CEBPB) and general transcription factor II-I (GTF2I).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Specific targeting of cone cells has never been attempted using vitreally administered AAV. In order to find suitable promoter sequences for restricted gene expression in cones applicable in the clinic, we focused on promoters that have previously been validated in either nonhuman primate (NHP) (18) or human tissue (4). We generated AAV2-7m8 vectors encoding GFP under the control of mouse cone arrestin (mCAR), PR2.1 and PR1.7 promoters (synthetic promoters based on the human red opsin gene enhancer and promoter sequences -their size is equal to 2.1 and 1.7 kilobases, respectively) and injected them at equal titers into eyes of 6-week-old WT mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do so, we analyzed transcription factor (TF) binding sites within each promoter sequence using bioinformatics (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). The present analysis aimed to answer the following questions: (i) why is PR1.7 more efficient than PR2.1 in cones (18), and (ii) why do PR2.1 and mCAR promoters lead to off-target expression after intravitreal administration? We hypothesized that the differential expression patterns observed between PR1.7 and PR2.1 are due to additional TF binding sites found in the 337-bp sequence located in the 5′ region of the PR2.1 promoter but not in the PR1.7 promoter (Figure 2, A and B).…”
“…[6][7][8] Studies in mouse, sheep, and dog models of achromatopsia caused by mutations in the CNGA3 and CNGB3 genes indicate that gene augmentation therapy using a recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector expressing a normal CNGA3 or CNGB3 gene can produce the functional CNGA3 or CNGB3 proteins and restore cone photoreceptor function. [9][10][11][12][13] As part of the efforts to develop a product candidate for treatment of humans with ACHM caused by mutations in the CNGA3 gene, an Investigational New Drug (IND)-enabling safety and efficacy study of AGTC-402, an AAV vector containing a conespecific promotor (PR1.7), 14 a codon-optimized human CNGA3 cDNA, and a SV40 polyadenylation sequence packaged in an AAV2 capsid containing three tyrosine to phenylalanine (YF) mutations, was conducted in CNGA3-deficient sheep.…”
{These authors contributed equally to this work.Applied Genetic Technologies Corporation (AGTC) is developing a recombinant adeno-associated virus (rAAV) vector expressing the human CNGA3 gene designated AGTC-402 (rAAV2tYF-PR1.7-hCNGA3) for the treatment of achromatopsia, an inherited retinal disorder characterized by markedly reduced visual acuity, extreme light sensitivity, and absence of color discrimination. The results are herein reported of a study evaluating safety and efficacy of AGTC-402 in CNGA3-deficient sheep. Thirteen day-blind sheep divided into three groups of four or five animals each received a subretinal injection of an AAV vector expressing a CNGA3 gene in a volume of 500 lL in the right eye. Two groups (n = 9) received either a lower or higher dose of the AGTC-402 vector, and one efficacy control group (n = 4) received a vector similar in design to one previously shown to rescue cone photoreceptor responses in the day-blind sheep model (rAAV5-PR2.1-hCNGA3). The left eye of each animal received a subretinal injection of 500 lL of vehicle (n = 4) or was untreated (n = 9). Subretinal injections were generally well tolerated and not associated with systemic toxicity. Most animals had mild to moderate conjunctival hyperemia, chemosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage immediately after surgery that generally resolved by postoperative day 7. Two animals treated with the higher dose of AGTC-402 and three of the efficacy control group animals had microscopic findings of outer retinal atrophy with or without inflammatory cells in the retina and choroid that were procedural and/or test-article related. All vector-treated eyes showed improved cone-mediated electroretinography responses with no change in rod-mediated electroretinography responses. Behavioral maze testing under photopic conditions showed significantly improved navigation times and reduced numbers of obstacle collisions in all vector-treated eyes compared to their contralateral control eyes or predose results in the treated eyes. These results support the use of AGTC-402 in clinical studies in patients with achromatopsia caused by CNGA3 mutations, with careful evaluation for possible inflammatory and/ or toxic effects.
Novel therapeutics for inherited retinal dystrophies (IRDs) have rapidly evolved since groundbreaking clinical trials for LCA due to RPE65 mutations led to the first FDAapproved in vivo gene therapy. Since then, advancements in viral vectors have led to more efficient AAV transduction and developed other viral vectors for gene augmentation therapy of large gene targets. Furthermore, significant developments in gene editing and RNA modulation technologies have introduced novel capabilities for treatment of autosomal dominant diseases, intronic mutations, and/or large genes otherwise unable to be treated with current viral vectors. We highlight strategies currently being evaluated in gene therapy clinical trials and promising preclinical developments for IRDs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.