Conectividad y desigualdad digital en Jalisco, México

Ramírez, Pablo Arredondo

doi:10.32870/cys.v0i30.6833

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Mariscal (2005) investigated the issues of the digital divide in Mexico and claimed that the social capital issue is one of the useful factors to reduce the digital divide in terms of ICT access. Similarly, in Arredondo Ramírez (2017), digital connectivity was found as one of the key indicators of digital inequality in the state of Jalisco (in Mexico). In another study, Rallet and Rochelandet (2007) explored the impact of ICT to create the digital inequalities in different context like developed country, developing country, urban or rural areas, and so on and highlighted two issues of creating digital divide: uses of ICT, and regional discrimination due to the network support; while Nemer et al (2013) showed how the materiality of digital artifacts contributes to digital inequalities in Brazil’s urban areas.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 87%

Exploring the Fundamental Factors of Digital Inequality in Bangladesh

Islam¹,

Inan²

2021

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital inequality is imperative to combat the perpetuation of national development and significantly exists in developing countries. Thus, the purpose of this article is to provide the underlying factors of creating digital inequality in Bangladesh. A mixed-method research approach was followed where both the qualitative and quantitative data were collected using focus group discussion (FGD), semi-structured interviews, and survey. The FGD and interviews were replicated with a total of 60 participants (each study with 30 participants), while 326 respondents participated in the survey study. The content analysis, word cloud, affinity diagram, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. As an outcome, the studies revealed 23 factors that create digital inequality in Bangladesh. The factors were clustered into five groups (referred as elements) of digital inequality through an affinity diagram. The resultant elements of digital inequality were educational, infrastructural, social, economic, and usable design. The results reflect on what factors should consider ensuring the inclusion, adoption, and contributions of information and communications technology in Bangladesh, which in turn contributes to reducing the digital inequality in Bangladesh. As a practical contribution, this research provides an in-depth scenario of digital inclusion and exclusion in Bangladesh, and the underline factors of creating digital inequality, so that nongovernmental organizations and government organizations may take necessary initiatives toward each dimension of digital inequality. The results also include identification of future research agenda toward reducing digital inequality.

show abstract

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 87%

Exploring the Fundamental Factors of Digital Inequality in Bangladesh

Islam¹,

Inan²

2021

Sage Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The studies (which are, henceforth, referenced by their number and can be consulted in Appendix), involved the participation of Latin American research centers (78.51%) from Mexico (studies 1, 8,11,13,14,18,31,34,35,42,46,48,51,58,60,63,67), Colombia (3,4,6,10,3 0,32,44,45,47,53,66), Brazil (16,17,22,33,39,55,64,65,68), Argentina (19,21,37,40,56,70), Chile (26,27,29,52,54), Peru (20,50), Uruguay (7,61), Bolivia (5,28), Ecuador (57), Costa Rica (69), Nicaragua (43), Dominican Republic (9) and Venezuela (36). In addition, albeit to a lesser extent, research centers from the United States (5.06%), Cana...…”

Section: Research Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The geographical areas covered in the studies (countries that have been the study area of research studies) were Argentina (19,21,37,40,56,70), Bolivia (5,28), Brazil (16,17,22,33,39,55,64,65,68), Chile (26,27,29,52,54), Colombia (3,4,6,10,30,32 ,44,45,47,53,66), Costa Rica (69), Ecuador (57), Mexico (1,8,11,13,14,18,31,34,35,42,46,48,51,58,60,63,67), Nicaragua (43), Peru (20,50), Dominican Republic (9), Uruguay (7,61), and Venezuela (36); in addition, comparative studies simultaneously referred to several Latin American countries or addressed Latin America generally (2, 12,15,…”

Section: Research Overviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization in Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review in Latin America

Espinosa Zárate,

Camilli Trujillo,

Plaza-de-la-Hoz

2023

Soc Indic Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present systematic review seeks to collect and analyze relevant academic approaches to the effects of digitalization on the populations that live in vulnerable contexts in Latin America with the purpose of examining to which extent the ongoing universalization of information and communication technologies has the potential to improve the lives of the most disadvantaged in this region. For this aim, both theoretical as well as empirical studies on these populations were considered, as long as they were from Latin America with the aim of listening to the voice of those involved, thus avoiding assigning understandings of the phenomenon and solutions that are alien to the characteristics of the region. Five databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, ERIC, Communication & Mass Media Complete and Dialnet) were consulted for the period 2001–2021. The analysis of the studies that met the inclusion criteria led to identifying seven themes that point to specific needs that must be met to advance development for the populations under study and that are useful for generating hypotheses for future effective interventions. Among them, some stand out: the specific demands of indigenous communities in the political agendas, the increasingly noticed opportunity for political empowerment through e-government, the development of a sense of belonging through technology, the potential of a digitally-mediated construction of personal identity, and the lack of enough consideration of cultural and situational factors that led to limited results in the implementation of digital public policies.

show abstract

The effect of using YouTube as a didactic support on microeconomy's grades

Gómez

Cuecuecha

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Conectividad y desigualdad digital en Jalisco, México

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

Exploring the Fundamental Factors of Digital Inequality in Bangladesh

Exploring the Fundamental Factors of Digital Inequality in Bangladesh

Digitalization in Vulnerable Populations: A Systematic Review in Latin America

The effect of using YouTube as a didactic support on microeconomy's grades

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About