2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl092153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Configuration of the Earth’s Magnetotail Current Sheet

Abstract: The spatial scale and intensity of Earth’s magnetotail current sheet determine the magnetotail configuration, which is critical to one of the most energetically powerful phenomena in the Earth’s magnetosphere, substorms. In the absence of statistical information about plasma currents, theories of the magnetotail current sheets were mostly based on the isotropic stress balance. Such models suggest that thin current sheets cannot be long and should have strong plasma pressure gradients along the magnetotail. Usi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, these current density values shown in Figure 3f are about five times larger than those determined from the large‐scale gradient between Cluster and MMS. This is possible due to the simplified current profile model as well as the large distance (>2 R E ) between Cluster and MMS across the current sheet, which would not allow to model a thin embedded current sheet expected to be observed at growth phase in near‐tail region (Artemyev et al., 2021; Petrukovich et al., 2011, 2015). Furthermore, it is apparent that the local current density in Figure 3f from both Cluster and MMS have a shorter time‐scale enhancement at the beginning of the current sheet thinning.…”
Section: Context Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, these current density values shown in Figure 3f are about five times larger than those determined from the large‐scale gradient between Cluster and MMS. This is possible due to the simplified current profile model as well as the large distance (>2 R E ) between Cluster and MMS across the current sheet, which would not allow to model a thin embedded current sheet expected to be observed at growth phase in near‐tail region (Artemyev et al., 2021; Petrukovich et al., 2011, 2015). Furthermore, it is apparent that the local current density in Figure 3f from both Cluster and MMS have a shorter time‐scale enhancement at the beginning of the current sheet thinning.…”
Section: Context Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The associated flow shear ∂u ix / ∂z drives the formation of the ion pressure nongyrotropy, P i , xz , the key element of 1D current sheet models with B z ≠ 0 (see Sitnov & Merkin, 2016; Zelenyi et al., 2011, and references therein). A finite P xz may explain the formation of current sheets with J y exceeding the isotropic limit c ( ∂P xx / ∂x )/ B z (see discussion of such strong J y observations in the magnetotail in Artemyev et al., 2021).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second model may be unstable to magnetic reconnection even for an ion‐scale current sheet (Bessho & Bhattacharjee, 2014; Pritchett, 2015; Sitnov et al., 2013). However, both models have difficulties in describing the most intense thin current sheets, those with J y > c ( ∂P / ∂x )/ B z often observed in the magnetotail (Artemyev, Angelopoulos, & Runov, 2016; Artemyev et al., 2021) and even in the reconstructed magnetotail empirical models (see discussion in Sitnov, Stephens, et al., 2021). If the current density J y exceeds c ( ∂P / ∂x )/ B z , the magnetic and thermal stress balance in the magnetotail current sheet requires a contribution from pressure anisotropy (e.g., electron anisotropy, see Artemyev, Vasko, et al., 2016) or nongyrotropy (e.g., P xz ≠ 0 due to ion demagnetized motion around the equatorial plane; see Ashour‐Abdalla et al., 1994; Burkhart et al., 1992; Mingalev et al., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In-situ spacecraft measurements of the magnetotail plasma and magnetic field are rather limited, as spacecraft (even multiple) can only simultaneously probe few spatially localized regions (see Refs. 6,7,8,9,10 for examples of probing of the magnetotail current sheet configuration with in-situ multi-spacecraft missions). Thus, alternative methods to examine the current sheet configuration can be especially useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%