Confirmatory factor analysis of planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks

Naglieri, Jack A.; Das, J. P.; Stevens, Joseph J.; Ledbetter, Mark

doi:10.1016/0022-4405(91)90011-f

Cited by 46 publications

(65 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, the automatization of writing, in expert adults, can sometimes be a source of errors, whereas the control of it, in children or novice writers, prevents the management of different operations in parallel (Hudson & Fivush, 1991). Writers must therefore continuously adjust the quantity of attention that they can grant to the different operations involved (Naglieri, Das, Stevens, & Ledbetter, 1990). Because the human information-processing system is limited (Shiffrin & Nosofsky, 1994;Velmans, 1991), some tasks can only be accomplished if they do not collectively exceed the subject's capacity (Richard, 1980).…”

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Subject-verb agreement errors in written productions: A study of French children and adults

Chanquoy¹,

Négro²

1996

J Psycholinguist Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This experiment was designed to simulate the conditions for subject-verb agreement errorsResearch indicates that written production is a very complex activity because writers must simultaneously or successively manage a large number of operations. They must search for and organize information (planning), choose correct syntactic structures and appropriate lexical items (translation), reread and perhaps revise an already-written text (revision), and last, program and

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 98%

Subject-verb agreement errors in written productions: A study of French children and adults

Chanquoy¹,

Négro²

1996

J Psycholinguist Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While some may argue that the concept of g can be useful in a global sense, the examination of human cognitive processes will be more completely accomplished through the use of a multiple-process conceptualization, which the present authors suggest explains human functioning more completely than the one-factor model (Naglieri, Das, Stevens, & Ledbetter, 1991). …”

Section: Examination Of the One-factor Modelmentioning

confidence: 80%

Construct Validity of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System Japanese Edition: Tests With Four Age Groups

Nakayama

Okazaki

Maekawa

2012

The Japanese Journal of Special Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Dentro del primer grupo, se calcularon las correlaciones entre el puntaje obtenido en la Escala Verbal del WISC III y los procesos Simultáneo y Sucesivo. Estos dos últimos procesos están involucrados en la producción y comprensión del lenguaje (ver Naglieri, 1999;Das, Naglieri & Kirby, 1994). Se encontraron correlaciones débiles y no significativas entre ambos puntajes (ver tabla).…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

“…Algunos de los tests más importantes fueron, y son en la actualidad, las escalas Wecshler (Wechsler, 1991), el test de Raven (Raven, 1991), el K-ABC de Kaufman (Kaufman y Kaufman, 1983, Chin et al, 2001) entre otros. Una debilidad general de las pruebas de inteligencia es que no son una operacionalización clara de una determinada teoría psicológica que las sustente (Naglieri, 1999;Naglieri y Kaufman, 2001). Das, Naglieri y Kirby (1994) consideran necesario tomar en cuenta otros enfoques alternativos que puedan echar algo de luz en el ámbito de la evaluación de habilidades intelectuales.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

La inteligencia de los niños

Nader

Benaím²

2005

Psicodebate

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ResumenSe presentan resultados parciales de una investigación que tiene como objetivo adaptar y estandarizar el uso de la batería neurocognitiva C.A.S. de Das y Naglieri (1997) en población infantil. La prueba es una operacionalización de un modelo no tradicional de la inteligencia (PASS) que considera las conductas inteligentes como un grupo de cuatro procesos cognitivos básicos (planeamiento, atención, procesamiento simultáneo y sucesivo). Los objetivos de este trabajo son obtener las propiedades psicométricas del instrumento y además, analizar si existen diferencias según sexo y edad. El tipo de estudio es correlacional -transaccional. Se administró el CAS a 150 niños residentes en la Ciudad de Buenos Aires entre las edades de 6 a 12 años (población general no consultante) y el WISC-III a una submuestra de 50 niños.Palabras Clave: neuropsicología, funciones ejecutivas, evaluación psicológica, inteligencia. AbstractPartial results of an investigation are presented whose primary objective is to adapt and to standardize the neurocognitive assessment battery C.A.S. of Das and Naglieri (1997) in a child sample. The test is an operationalization of a non traditional intelligence model (PASS) that considers the intelligent behaviors as a group of four cognitive basic processes (planning, attention, simultaneous and successive processing). The objectives of this work are to obtain the psychometric properties of the instrument and also, to analyze if differences exist according to sex and age. The study type is crosswise -transactional. It was administered the CAS to 150 children residents in Buenos Aires among the ages of 6 to 12 years (population general non consultant) and the WISC-III to a sample of 50 children.

show abstract

Confirmatory factor analysis of planning, attention, simultaneous, and successive cognitive processing tasks

Cited by 46 publications

References 32 publications

Subject-verb agreement errors in written productions: A study of French children and adults

Subject-verb agreement errors in written productions: A study of French children and adults

Construct Validity of the Das-Naglieri Cognitive Assessment System Japanese Edition: Tests With Four Age Groups

La inteligencia de los niños

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About