2015
DOI: 10.1177/2158244015611456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students

Abstract: The relative fit of one- and two-factor models of the Procrastination Assessment Scale for Students (PASS) was investigated using confirmatory factor analysis on an ethnically diverse sample of 345 participants. The results indicated that although the two-factor model provided better fit to the data than the one-factor model, neither model provided optimal fit. However, a two-factor model which accounted for common item theme pairs used by Solomon and Rothblum in the creation of the scale provided good fit to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Some researches showed a negative correlation between mindfulness and non-acceptance of unpleasant emotion (1). Mindfulness group in comparison to unfocused attention had a higher level of willingness to view unfavorable images, which was representative of decreased non-acceptance (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researches showed a negative correlation between mindfulness and non-acceptance of unpleasant emotion (1). Mindfulness group in comparison to unfocused attention had a higher level of willingness to view unfavorable images, which was representative of decreased non-acceptance (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…PASS consists of 18 items. Alpha coefficient of PASS was reported 0.77 (23). Researchers reported the reliability of 0.78 (24).…”
Section: Procrastination Assessment Scale-studentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has 18 items. Researchers reported alpha coefficient of 0.77 and showed that it has 3 factors [32]. The validity of the PASS was confirmed during the early development of the scale [4].…”
Section: Procrastination Assessment Scale-student (Pass)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…gösterilebilir. Solomon ve Rothblum (1984: 509) erteleme alışkanlığının nedenlerini duruma hâkim olamama endişesi, mükemmeliyetçilik, karar verme zorluğu, başkasına bağımlılık ve dışarıdan yardım arama, belirli görevleri yerine getirmekten kaçınma ve hayal kırıklığına uğratma korkusu, aşırı özgüven/özgüven eksikliği, tembellik, iddia eksikliği, başarı korkusu, tükenmişlik ve kötü zaman yönetimi, kontrole karşı isyan, risk alma unsuru ve akran etkisi olmak üzere 13 grupta incelemişlerdir (Ratsameemonthon, 2015: 78;Sadykova, 2016;Yockey & Kralowec, 2015).…”
Section: İşyeri Prokrastinasyonu / İşyerinde Erteleme Alışkanlığıunclassified