2011
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.21086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confocal backscattering‐based detection of leukemic cells in flowing blood samples

Abstract: The prognostic value of assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) in leukemia has been established with advancements in flow cytometry and PCR. Nonetheless, these techniques are limited by high equipment costs, complex, and costly cell processing and the need for highly trained personnel. Here, we demonstrate the potential of exploiting differences in the relative intensities of backscattered light at three wavelengths to detect the presence of leukemic cells in samples containing varying mixtures of white bloo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to evaluate level of autofluorescence, blood was also collected from NOD/SCID mice that were not injected with any tumor cells. All blood samples were collected in heparin (100 USP units/sample), diluted and processed the same day for detection of GFP‐positive CTCs using a confocal flow cytometry system at a flow rate of 4.5 μl/min, as previously described (Greiner et al , ). Enumerated cells were identified with a previously described algorithm based on the combined detection of peaks appearing simultaneously in a fluorescence channel optimized for GFP detection and in at least one of the channels detecting scattering at either 405 or 488 nm (Hwu et al , ) (see supplementary materials).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate level of autofluorescence, blood was also collected from NOD/SCID mice that were not injected with any tumor cells. All blood samples were collected in heparin (100 USP units/sample), diluted and processed the same day for detection of GFP‐positive CTCs using a confocal flow cytometry system at a flow rate of 4.5 μl/min, as previously described (Greiner et al , ). Enumerated cells were identified with a previously described algorithm based on the combined detection of peaks appearing simultaneously in a fluorescence channel optimized for GFP detection and in at least one of the channels detecting scattering at either 405 or 488 nm (Hwu et al , ) (see supplementary materials).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were flowed in 30x30 µm 2 microfluidic channels made of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) with a glass bottom microscope slide, described previously [24]. Flexible tubing on one end of the devices was submerged in a cell solution constantly being stirred by a magnetic spin bar, while tubing on the other end was connected to a syringe pump pulling at 3 µl min −1 .…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The confocal backscatter and fluorescence flow cytometer has been described in greater detail by Greiner et al [24]. Briefly, light from 405nm, 488nm, and 633nm lasers was directed into a single illumination path by mirrors and dichroic filters.…”
Section: Flow Cytometer and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, techniques including density-gradient based centrifugation , microfiltration (Zheng et al, 2011), hydrodynamic sorting by size (Loutherback et al, 2012), separation by cell deformability (Tan et al, 2009), immunoassay based on tumour-specific surface protein expression (Alix-Panabieres and Pantel, 2014), and molecular markers (Nagrath et al, 2007) have been employed to effectively separate these cells from normal blood cells before capture. Subsequent enumeration of captured CTCs has been demonstrated with such techniques as immunofluorescence (Ignatiadis et al, 2008), confocal microscopy (Greiner et al, 2011), absorbance (VilaPlanas et al, 2011), chemiluminescence (Hun et al, 2010), interference spectroscopy (Kumeria et al, 2012), surface-enhanced Raman scattering (Lee et al, 2014b) and surface plasmon resonance (Law et al, 2011). However, a simple, sensitive and robust assay that allows routine detection and subsequent molecular characterization of CTCs in a clinical setting has not been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%