2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41390-020-0757-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confounding biases in studies on early- versus late-caffeine in preterm infants: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, all observational studies, including ours, have inherent limitations 26. Nylander et al conducted a systematic review of studies comparing early versus late caffeine but were unable to draw conclusions from 12 cohort studies due to methodological problems 26. We attempted to minimise these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, all observational studies, including ours, have inherent limitations 26. Nylander et al conducted a systematic review of studies comparing early versus late caffeine but were unable to draw conclusions from 12 cohort studies due to methodological problems 26. We attempted to minimise these.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sub-DOI: 10.1159/000528914 group analysis from the CAP trial showed better outcomes with earlier treatment [150]. Caffeine prophylaxis has become widespread based on cohort studies, despite the risk of bias, since earlier treatment is associated with better outcomes [150,151]. Randomised trials of caffeine prophylaxis for extremely preterm infants are scarce and show conflicting results [152,153], and further studies combining caffeine prophylaxis with LISA are currently underway.…”
Section: Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other large retrospective studies and systematic reviews have reported similar beneficial outcomes with early initiation of caffeine, including a reduction in rates of death or broncho‐pulmonary dysplasia (BPD), and better neuro‐developmental outcomes at 18–24 months corrected age 6–9 . Conversely, some studies have reported adverse outcomes, such as increases in mortality and/or inconclusive results for the benefits of early initiation of caffeine 10,11 . A randomised controlled trial (RCT) has previously been conducted to evaluate the effect of early caffeine treatment (in the first 5 days) in ventilated pre‐term infants (<30 weeks) compared to prescribing caffeine prior to extubation 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9] Conversely, some studies have reported adverse outcomes, such as increases in mortality and/or inconclusive results for the benefits of early initiation of caffeine. 10,11 A randomised controlled trial (RCT) has previously been conducted to evaluate the effect of early caffeine treatment (in the first 5 days) in ventilated pre-term infants (<30 weeks) compared to prescribing caffeine prior to extubation. 12 This trial was terminated prematurely with a non-significant increase in mortality in the early caffeine group, with no 5 m difference in age at first extubation (primary outcome) and other outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%