2020
DOI: 10.1093/ips/olaa001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Confronting the International Political Sociology of the New Right

Abstract: The rise of radical right-wing leaders, parties, movements, and ideas have transformed not only domestic political landscapes but also the direction and dynamics of international relations. Yet for all their emphasis on nationalist identity, on “America First” and “Taking Back Control,” there is an unmistakable international dimension to contemporary nationalist, populist movements. Yet these movements are also often transnationally linked. We argue that a constitutive part of this globality is the New Right's… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There were a number of examples of this when talking about Sebastian Gorka or Steve Bannon and Breitbart’s connection to both the Alt-Right and Trump, where the term Alt-Right was not explained at all, yet the story was connected to mainstream presidential politics without differentiating it from more typical conservative views (Deng, 2017; Edelman, 2017). When much of conservative media engaged in rhetoric designed to separate the population and create fear, the Alt-Right might have more easily slipped into press coverage (Abrahamsen et al, 2020; Hartzell, 2018; Tanner & Campana, 2019). The first part of the assumption was based on past framing studies in which groups that succeeded in achieving rhetorical goals often did so through consistency in framing, which determines how influential a group is in advancing its frame through the media (Wagner & Gruszczynski, 2016).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were a number of examples of this when talking about Sebastian Gorka or Steve Bannon and Breitbart’s connection to both the Alt-Right and Trump, where the term Alt-Right was not explained at all, yet the story was connected to mainstream presidential politics without differentiating it from more typical conservative views (Deng, 2017; Edelman, 2017). When much of conservative media engaged in rhetoric designed to separate the population and create fear, the Alt-Right might have more easily slipped into press coverage (Abrahamsen et al, 2020; Hartzell, 2018; Tanner & Campana, 2019). The first part of the assumption was based on past framing studies in which groups that succeeded in achieving rhetorical goals often did so through consistency in framing, which determines how influential a group is in advancing its frame through the media (Wagner & Gruszczynski, 2016).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Also see Chacko and Jayasuriya (2017) and Abrahamsen et al (2020). 20 Even PRC and US officials sometimes find themselves in the "same" ideological coalition.…”
Section: Research Design and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Beyond a nationalism with a narrow domestic focus, these forces seek to fundamentally re-imagine the international political order in alignment with their reactionary nationalist values. 16 This article situates the rise of radical conservatism in Japan as part and parcel of this wider trend.…”
Section: Palabras Clavementioning
confidence: 99%