1983
DOI: 10.1017/s0001566000008138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Anomalies in Twins in Aberdeen and Northeast Scotland

Abstract: Data with regard to the proportion of congenital malformations found at birth are presented from a survey of 657 pairs of twins of known zygosity and placentation delivered in Aberdeen and Northeast Scotland between 1968 and 1979. There was an excess of malformed individuals from monozygotic (MZ) pairs, but this did not reach statistical significance. The possible effect of monochorionic placentation in the causation of malformations in MZ twins in general is discussed. It seems that this type of placentation … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relative risk was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.6–3.7) between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. This result is comparable to a study in Aberdeen including 657 women with twin pregnancies in which the relative risk was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8–2.5)15 (Table 7). The relative risk in 508 women with twin pregnancies between monozygotic and dizygotic twins was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9–2.0) in the National Collaborative Perinatal Project from 12 institutions in the USA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relative risk was 1.5 (95% CI, 0.6–3.7) between monozygotic and dizygotic twins. This result is comparable to a study in Aberdeen including 657 women with twin pregnancies in which the relative risk was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.8–2.5)15 (Table 7). The relative risk in 508 women with twin pregnancies between monozygotic and dizygotic twins was 1.4 (95% CI, 0.9–2.0) in the National Collaborative Perinatal Project from 12 institutions in the USA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Structural anomalies have been reported to occur more often in monozygotic twins compared with dizygotic twins and singletons4, 9–13, with relative risks of congenital anomalies in twins compared with singletons of 1.17 (95% CI, 1.04–1.3) for dizygotic twins11 and 1.25 (95% CI, 1.21–1.28) for monozygotic twins14. The risk of malformations in monozygotic twins is higher than that in dizygotic twins, with a relative risk of congenital anomalies in monozygotic compared with dizygotic twins of 1.4–2.710, 11, 15.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Nevertheless, congenital heart defects occur more commonly in monochorionic than in dichorionic monozygotic twins, 32 and in terms of acquired congenital heart lesions monochorionic placentation and its complications may provide a less favourable environment for the developing fetus. In addition to the altered vascular responses described in childhood, 14 fetal responses to circulatory imbalance in chronic twin-twin transfusion may provide the substrate for pulmonary valve stenosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these factors are racial, socioeconomic, and geographical factors (Cunningham et al, 2001). Furthermore, chorionicity also affects the frequency of birth defects in that monochorionicity enhances the risk of birth defects (Corney et al, 1983;Cunningham et al, 2001;Wennerholm et al, 2000). In this study, we dealt with a homogeneous population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%