2006
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-955174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital Breast Deformity Reconstruction Using Perforator Flaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…41 Most authors considered skin loss between 10 and 20 percent 17,18,20,42-45 as their cutoff for inclusion, although some authors labeled flaps with less than 5 percent skin loss as "partial necrosis," 46,47 and others categorized skin loss greater than 20 percent as "partial necrosis." 19,35,39,48 Fat necrosis had a range of definitions, including (1) absolute size (lumps >0.5 cm, 49 >1 cm, 6,25,39,50 >2 cm, 15,40,51 >3 cm 16 confirmed not to be malignant recurrence) detected clinically or by ultrasound 49,52,53 and/or mammography 46,54 , (2) proportion of volume of flap 18,43 , and (3) incidence of secondary operations to address fat necrosis.. 21,22,[55][56][57] Other authors chose to describe necrosis as "minor," 58 "minimal," 59 or "limited." 60 Another variable in fat necrosis reporting was the time frame-many authors reported detection rates at 2 39 to 3 6,15 months after the initial reconstruction, but others reported rates at 1 month 41 or even 1 year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Most authors considered skin loss between 10 and 20 percent 17,18,20,42-45 as their cutoff for inclusion, although some authors labeled flaps with less than 5 percent skin loss as "partial necrosis," 46,47 and others categorized skin loss greater than 20 percent as "partial necrosis." 19,35,39,48 Fat necrosis had a range of definitions, including (1) absolute size (lumps >0.5 cm, 49 >1 cm, 6,25,39,50 >2 cm, 15,40,51 >3 cm 16 confirmed not to be malignant recurrence) detected clinically or by ultrasound 49,52,53 and/or mammography 46,54 , (2) proportion of volume of flap 18,43 , and (3) incidence of secondary operations to address fat necrosis.. 21,22,[55][56][57] Other authors chose to describe necrosis as "minor," 58 "minimal," 59 or "limited." 60 Another variable in fat necrosis reporting was the time frame-many authors reported detection rates at 2 39 to 3 6,15 months after the initial reconstruction, but others reported rates at 1 month 41 or even 1 year.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Careful assessment of recipient vessels is recommended to detect any anomaly of the internal mammary vessels and subscapular vascular system. 4 Because of the high-quality of abdominal tissue, DIEP f lap is considered as the first choice for breast and chest wall reconstruction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%