1971
DOI: 10.1136/adc.46.248.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congenital epulis: its natural history.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are no reports in the literature to suggest that CGCEs increase in size after birth [2,36]. Furthermore, there is reported evidence that small lesions regressed during the first year of life [36][37][38][39]. Another point of interest is that there are no reports of recurrence of a CGCE in spite of an incomplete excision [4,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are no reports in the literature to suggest that CGCEs increase in size after birth [2,36]. Furthermore, there is reported evidence that small lesions regressed during the first year of life [36][37][38][39]. Another point of interest is that there are no reports of recurrence of a CGCE in spite of an incomplete excision [4,36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The lesion grows only during the intrauterine period and ceases to grow at birth [34,35]. There are no reports in the literature to suggest that CGCEs increase in size after birth [2,36]. Furthermore, there is reported evidence that small lesions regressed during the first year of life [36][37][38][39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Although histologically benign, clinically significant problems like polyhydramnios, neonatal respiratory distress and feeding difficulties have been reported (Lack et al, 1981;Ophir and Marshak, 1985). Postnatal tumour growth does not occur and a few cases of spontaneous tumour regression have been described (Jenkins and Hill, 1968;O'Brien and Pielou, 1971;Cussen and McMahon, 1975). Prompt surgical removal, however, has proven to be an effective treatment, with few complications and no recurrences, even when the excision was incomplete (Lack et al, 1981;Zuker and Buenechea, 1993).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Simple comparison of these indices is difficult, but considering the high cell activity in infants, the proliferative activity in our patient may not have been high. Cases in which size reduction and disappearance of lesions within 1 year of course observation have also been reported [15][16][17]. Moreover, the size has varied from several mm to 9 cm in reported cases [18][19][20], and large lesions in the anterior tooth region have been reported, although these may have been due to the influence of mechanical stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%