2004
DOI: 10.3141/1876-08
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Congested Freeway Microsimulation Model Using VISSIM

Abstract: A procedure for constructing and calibrating a detailed model of a freeway by using VISSIM is presented and applied to a 15-mi stretch of I-210 West in Pasadena, California. This test site provides several challenges for microscopic modeling: a high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane with an intermittent barrier, a heavy freeway connector, 20 metered on-ramps with and without HOV bypass lanes, and three interacting bottlenecks. Field data used as input to the model were compiled from two separate sources: loop detec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
85
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
2
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the first two parameters of the model were selected for calibration: (1) CC0, standstill distance, defined as the desired distance between vehicles when stopped, and (2) CC1, headway time, defined as the desired headway between vehicles in seconds. According to previous studies (e.g., Chitturi & Benekohal, 2008b;Gomes, May, & Horowitz, 2004;Lownes & Machemehl, 1988), the effect of these two parameters on capacity was found to be statistically significant, and therefore, they were both selected for calibration of VISSIM to the driving behavior in Louisiana.…”
Section: Calibration Of Vissimmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this study, the first two parameters of the model were selected for calibration: (1) CC0, standstill distance, defined as the desired distance between vehicles when stopped, and (2) CC1, headway time, defined as the desired headway between vehicles in seconds. According to previous studies (e.g., Chitturi & Benekohal, 2008b;Gomes, May, & Horowitz, 2004;Lownes & Machemehl, 1988), the effect of these two parameters on capacity was found to be statistically significant, and therefore, they were both selected for calibration of VISSIM to the driving behavior in Louisiana.…”
Section: Calibration Of Vissimmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Traffic flow was simulated through dynamic assignment [42] that determined the amount and routing of the simulated vehicles. Real traffic monitoring data of both cases were collected by traffic cameras on surrounding road networks at that time.…”
Section: Accuracy Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several default vehicle types (e.g., Car, HGV, and Bus), are applied in the simulation model together with their default parameters (e.g., Length and Width). Generator (SSG), which is programmable through the VAP interface and a separate module from the traffic simulation module [34].…”
Section: Vissim As a Simulation Technology Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%