systems have already yielded impressive results, such as a bionic hand with sensory feedback, [11] and a closed-loop optogenetic system that can modulate bladder function in rats. [12] These developments provide us with a helpful template for the future of nano-bioelectronics. In the coming years, we expect to see a proliferation of integrated devices and closed-loop systems that incorporate nanoelectronics in biological contexts.Nanoelectronics present us with a number of features that make them particularly desirable in biological research. Nanomaterials can possess unique optical, [13] electronic, [14,15] and magnetic [16,17] properties that only become evident at sufficiently small length scales. Moreover, nanoelectronics provide the opportunity to probe the coupling of electric phenomena and physiology from the scale of tissues and organs down to the scale of individual cells and organelles (Figure 1). [18][19][20][21] The ability of these materials to target such small structures opens the door to inquiries into the pathways for electrical transduction in biology at the scale of the pertinent molecules, and to leverage those to access therapeutic targets that would otherwise be unavailable.We draw a contrast here between inorganic nanobioelectronics, which are the focus of this Progress Report, and organic nano-bioelectronics, which are also a subject of intense research. Inorganic devices in this context are typically made from semiconductor or metal materials, while organic ones are primarily carbon-based and may be derived from biological sources. Organic devices have shown great promise as bioelectronics, and we refer the reader to a small selection of the numerous excellent articles regarding nanodiamonds, [22][23][24][25][26] carbon nanotubes, [27][28][29] and graphene-based materials [15,30,31] as well as conjugated polymers [32] and biologically-derived nanomaterials. [33,34] In broad terms, the advantages of inorganic nanomaterials are that they can adopt a wide array of precisely tunable architectures and functionalities, which can be achieved through numerous techniques during synthesis. [15,[35][36][37][38] Their disadvantages include potentially high costs of manufacture, particularly with respect to noble metal precursors, [36,39] and the possibility for accumulation without degradation in cells. [40,41] Organic nanomaterials tend to have good biocompatibility when functionalized appropriately. [23,26,32,42] They also integrate well with other bioelectronic tools, either as extensions to scaffolds [32] or as the scaffolds themselves, [33] and they can minimize negative cellular responses to mechanical mismatches between the cytoskeleton and the device. [32,33] Compared to inorganic The last several years have seen a large and increasing interest in scientific developments that combine methods and materials from nanotechnology with questions and applications in bioelectronics. This follows with a number of broader trends: the rapid increase in functionality for materials at the nanoscale; a gro...