“…As a consequence, the aggregation of Pt(II) complexes leads to a broader red-shifted absorption and emission originating from states with formal metal–metal to ligand–ligand charge-transfer configuration (MMLLCT, d z 2 – d z 2 –π*−π*). − If compared with the ground state, such aggregates can show an excimeric character to variable extents due to the partial depopulation of an antibonding σ-orbital (derived from the overlap of two d z 2 lobes) with the partial occupation of an intermolecular bonding orbital (π*−π*) derived from ligand-centered (LC) antibonding orbitals. Instead, for the monomeric species, the photoluminescence occurs mainly from metal-perturbed ligand-centered ( 3 ML-LC) triplet states as admixtures of LC (π–π*) and metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT, d –π*) character. ,, While the monomeric species can be quenched by diffusion-controlled processes such as a shortening of excited state lifetimes and/or reduction of emission intensity, the luminescence from aggregated species appears rather insensitive to 3 O 2 . Hence, they can be used in a variety of fields, such as ratiometric oxygen sensing, with aggregates as internal references, or in the field of bioimaging. , However, while for some applications, aggregation can be advantageous, it represents a drawback if color purity is desired, which is the case in electrophosphorescent devices such as OLEDs. , Additionally, both brightness and a defined composition are criteria to be fulfilled for biomedical applications. ,,− Since tailored Pt(II) complexes can be used as biomarkers or in anti-cancer treatments, it is very important to control both photophysical and structural properties, such as emission color, lifetimes, and aggregation feasibility as they can affect their detection or interaction with biomembranes within the cellular environment or in the extra-cellular matrix as well as cellular uptake.…”