“…QDs emerged in the past decade as superior substitutes for organic dyes in diagnostics due to their remarkable photochemical/physical properties, such as high photostability, high quantum yield (QY), and remarkable capabilities for multiplexing. , These properties, combined with methods to solubilize QDs in aqueous media as well as conjugating biological molecules, have led to a great interest for the utilization of QDs as fluorescent markers in molecular, cellular, and in vivo imaging. , The toxicity of hydrophobic QDs due to organic ligands can be overcome by capping the QDs with a hydrophilic corona . Nevertheless, there are several unmet challenges in the development of QDs for theranostic use including (i) fluorescent signal reduction due to serum protein adsorption following systemic administration, − (ii) enhanced quenching in the presence of oxidative or acidic conditions characterizing inflammation and lysosomal milieu, , (iii) quenching due to intracellular aggregation, (iv) the intrinsic cytotoxicity of released Cd 2+ /Se 2– , and (v) the wide systemic biodistribution. In an attempt to overcome some of the aforementioned limitations, nanocarrier systems for QD delivery have been suggested including polymeric nanoparticles (NPs), micelles, , and liposomes. − However, none of these described delivery systems adequately addressed the requirements for efficient fluorescent imaging including high QY, prolonged decay lifetime, high stability in serum proteins and acidic pH, no premature leakage of QDs, high encapsulation yield, and demonstrating imaging efficacy in vitro as well as in vivo .…”