Conjunto de indicadores de calidad y seguridad para hospitales de la Agencia Valenciana de Salud

Marzal, Cristina María Nebot; Mira, José Joaquín; Guilabert, Mercedes; Pérez-Jover, Virtudes; Pablo-Comeche, D.; Quirós-Morató, T.; Cuesta-Peredó, David

doi:10.1016/j.cali.2013.08.003

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a starting point, it should be said that the center had a nursing assessment protocol that specified that nursing assessment included the three instruments used in this study and that it should be performed within the first 24 h after admission. It was also intended to clarify that the performance of the nursing assessment was considered a quality objective that would be used at the macromanagement level to assess nursing performance in this study [ 35 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis

Llagostera-Reverter,

Luna-Aleixos,

Valero-Chillerón

et al. 2023

Nursing Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The main objective of this study was to analyze the impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve the assessment of functional capacity, risk of pressure injuries, and risk of falls at the time of admission of patients in adult hospitalization units. This was a secondary analysis of the VALENF project databases during two periods (October–December 2020, before the strategy, and October–December 2021, after the strategy). The quantity and quality of nursing assessments performed on patients admitted to adult hospitalization units were evaluated using the Barthel index, Braden index, and Downton scale. The number of assessments completed before the implementation of the new strategy was n = 686 (28.01%), versus n = 1445 (58.73%) in 2021 (p < 0.001). The strategy improved the completion of the evaluations of the three instruments from 63.4% (n = 435) to 71.8% (n = 1038) (p < 0.001). There were significant differences depending on the hospitalization unit and the assessment instrument (p < 0.05). The strategy employed was, therefore, successful. The nursing assessments show a substantial improvement in both quantity and quality, representing a noticeable improvement in nursing practice. This study was not registered.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis

Llagostera-Reverter,

Luna-Aleixos,

Valero-Chillerón

et al. 2023

Nursing Reports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Los indicadores seleccionados se agruparon en base a categorías y subcategorías (10,11,3): Indicadores de Tiempo (tiempos de espera/ proceso), Calidad (errores/cumplimiento de es-tándares/satisfacción), Eficiencia (productividad (rendimiento)/cumplimiento de estándares), Capacidad (oferta/demanda) y Económicos (costos/ financieros) (Tabla 1).…”

Section: Etapa 1: Levantamiento De Información Y Modelo De Indicadoresunclassified

Indicadores de gestión para evaluar el desempeño de hospitales públicos: Un caso de estudio en Chile y Ecuador

Armijos

Mondaca

2020

Rev. méd. Chile

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Assessing the performance of public hospitals using key indicators: a case study in Chile and Ecuador Background: Continuous improvement, quality of care, and patient satisfaction demand the implementation of coordinated actions from all the healthcare personnel. They also require collaboration, management skills and attention to different dimensions to improve problems due to the lack of resources such as specialists, medical technology and infrastructure. Aim: To design and implement a model of indicators to evaluate the performance of hospitals. Material and Methods: The methodology used in this research included a review of the literature, data collection, conducting interviews, defining objectives and indicators, proposing a model of indicators, validating the set of indicators, implementing the indicators in a hospital, and analyzing the results. Results: The proposed model of 95 indicators was implemented in a hospital in Ecuador. The results indicate that 37 indicators meet the standard, 19 need to be reviewed, 10 show non-compliance and need serious improvements, and the remaining 29 were not informed by the hospital under study. Conclusions: The defined indicators are aimed to improve the performance of a hospital, are easily interpreted, can be measured without spending large amounts of money, and do not need excessive efforts to collect data, mainly if they are supported by information systems.

show abstract

“…En 2011, la Sociedad Española de Calidad Asistencial 4 (SECA) lideró un amplio estudio para identificar indicadores de calidad a nivel hospitalario y en la 5. a Reunión de Coordinadores avanzó una propuesta de indicadores de efectividad clínica 5 . Nebot et al 6 han identificado indicadores de eficiencia, efectividad de la atención médica y cuidados de enfermería también a nivel hospitalario.…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Indicadores de eficiencia para contribuir a la sostenibilidad de los servicios de salud en España

García

Mira

Guilabert

2014

Revista de Calidad Asistencial

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conjunto de indicadores de calidad y seguridad para hospitales de la Agencia Valenciana de Salud

Cited by 5 publications

References 25 publications

Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis

Improving Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units: A Secondary Analysis

Indicadores de gestión para evaluar el desempeño de hospitales públicos: Un caso de estudio en Chile y Ecuador

Indicadores de eficiencia para contribuir a la sostenibilidad de los servicios de salud en España

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About