“…This is due to the dynamic nature of the reading process, which exhibits quite complex dynamics: For example, reading of connected text leads to highly nonstationary reading times (Wallot, Hollis, & van Rooij, 2013), where a single word can have a significant impact on how reading performance changes over the next several hundred words (Booth, Brown, Eason, Wallot, & Kelty-Stephen, 2016) and where qualitative changes in reading performance occur (Wallot, O'Brien, Haussmann, Kloos, & Lyby, 2014), which are potentially indicative of qualitative shifts in the mental representations as a function of comprehension (Stephen, Dixon, & Isenhower, 2009). Moreover, the problem with naturalistic texts is that they are highly structured stimuli that cannot be experimentally manipulated, as one can do with random word lists in lexical decision and naming tasks, because the different psychologically relevant text descriptors are highly correlated among each other (Graf, Nagler, & Jacobs, 2005) and with the syntactical structure of a text (e.g., Keller, Carpenter, & Just, 2001) and their effects change across the time-course of reading (McNerney, Goodwin, & Radvansky, 2011;Teng, Wallot, & Kelty-Stephen, 2016;.…”