2018
DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2018.1458215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting children to nature through residential outdoor environmental education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Bruni et al (2017) found that only the activity in which children engaged artistically with the natural world, such as narrative writing, art work, and photography, created a positive shift in nature connection. Immersive experiences and free outdoor play were seen as a positive feature by Mullenbach et al (2018) as well as Schneider and Schaal (2017). There was heterogeneity in the types of environments reported, and these environments were idiosyncratic to the location of the study.…”
Section: Length Type Of Intervention and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Bruni et al (2017) found that only the activity in which children engaged artistically with the natural world, such as narrative writing, art work, and photography, created a positive shift in nature connection. Immersive experiences and free outdoor play were seen as a positive feature by Mullenbach et al (2018) as well as Schneider and Schaal (2017). There was heterogeneity in the types of environments reported, and these environments were idiosyncratic to the location of the study.…”
Section: Length Type Of Intervention and Environmentmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Most programs that produce significant quantitative gains in nature connection last several days. In different studies, extended time meant 3–5days of immersion in residential field sites (Braun & Dierkes, 2017; Hinds & O'Malley, 2019; Liefländer et al., 2013; Mullenbach, Andrejewski, & Mowen, 2019; Stern, Powell, & Ardoin, 2008; Talebpour, Busk, Heimlich, & Ardoin, 2020), 4 days to 2 weeks enrolled in nature‐based camps or wilderness expeditions (Barton, Bragg, Pretty, Roberts, & Wood, 2016; Collado et al., 2013; Ernst & Theimer, 2011; San Jose & Nelson, 2017), 4 weeks of nature play and learning in a preschool (Yilmaz, Çig, & Yilmaz‐Bolat, 2020), repeated field trips to natural areas (Ernst & Theimer, 2011) and school curricula that last several weeks and include hands‐on nature experiences (Cho & Lee, 2018; Harvey et al., 2020; Sheldrake et al., 2019). But even programs that involved only a day of classroom lessons about forests combined with activities in a forest (Kossack & Bogner, 2012), a few hours of forest exploration (Dopko, Capaldi, & Zelenski, 2019; Schneider & Schaal, 2018) or trips to natural areas or a natural history museum (Bruni, Ballew, Winter, & Omoto, 2018; Crawford et al., 2017; Sheldrake et al., 2019) resulted in immediate significant gains in nature connection scores.…”
Section: Integrating Research On Nature Connection and Coping With Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Student behavioral indicators that show ecoliteracy include not littering, able to take advantage of organic and inorganic waste, and participate in maintaining the existing plants in the school environment as Green House program. Involving students interacting directly with environmental conservation activities has implicitly established a responsibility attitude as Lauren (14) argues that providing opportunities for children to be close to nature and spending time outside the home may indicate a predictor of responsible environmental behavior.…”
Section: Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%