2022
DOI: 10.29333/iji.2022.15134a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connecting Science, Design Thinking, and Computational Thinking through Sports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if at first glance the connection between CT and such diverse subjects, especially B and PE, seems impossible, previous studies show that this is not (Hammrich et al, 2021;Galoyan et al, 2022). However, in order to be able to make general statements more scientific research must be done in this field in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even if at first glance the connection between CT and such diverse subjects, especially B and PE, seems impossible, previous studies show that this is not (Hammrich et al, 2021;Galoyan et al, 2022). However, in order to be able to make general statements more scientific research must be done in this field in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be done by training analyses but also through problem-solving tasks. A study from Galoyan et al (2022) combines athletic fields, such as track and field and basketball, with scientific topics, design thinking principles, and CT. In doing so, they also demonstrate many ways in which CT can be implemented through sports into everyday school life ( Galoyan et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Chan and Nagatomo (2022), some students felt the assignment based on the make prototype phase to be difficult and that the content was too much for them. Students reported experiencing constraints from their make prototype project materials when their original solutions were revised to accommodate changes in the design approach, according to Galoyan, et al (2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, Roth, et al (2020) found that it is still unknown whether how the make prototype stage is taught has an impact on both innovation and as a key labour market provider. At the same time, Galoyan, et al (2022) observed that the same students who must participate in the labour market had constraints as a result of their make prototype project. Part of this reasoning was based on Chan and Nagatomo's (2022) observation that some students considered their assignment based on the make prototype phase to be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%