2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-021-01297-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Connectivity in support of student co-design of innovative mathematics curriculum trajectories

Abstract: The argument of this theoretical paper is that the existence and availability of suitable digital curriculum resources, accelerated by the recent pandemic, have required a revision of the pedagogical landscape in terms of ways in which students can be empowered to (co-)design their own curriculum trajectories. For this purpose, I argue, students need to be supported in considering many connections, to arrive at coherent trajectories. Based on complexity thinking and curriculum design with digital resources, I … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We adopt the implementation of three-tier distributed object architecture, namely client layer, server layer, and database access layer [33]. Further subdivide and refine the three-tier structure.…”
Section: Experimental Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopt the implementation of three-tier distributed object architecture, namely client layer, server layer, and database access layer [33]. Further subdivide and refine the three-tier structure.…”
Section: Experimental Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories show that the field has changed with the further development of CRs. With the introduction of other CRs besides mathematics textbooks issues of coordination, orchestration (Drijvers, Gitirana, et al, 2019), and connectivity Pepin, 2021) in resource systems (Wang, 2018) became increasingly relevant. The diversification of different types of CRs can be mainly attributed to the fast-evolving development of dCRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hal yang hampir serupa juga tertuang dalam kompetensi inti mata pelajaran matematika untuk jenjang SMA/K kurikulum 2013, yaitu siswa mampu mengolah, menalar, menyaji, dan mencipta dalam ranah konkret dan ranah abstrak terkait dengan pengembangan dari yang dipelajarinya di sekolah secara mandiri, dan mampu menggunakan metode sesuai kaidah keilmuan (Utari & Hartono, 2019). Standar kompetensi lulusan dan kompetensi inti yang dirumuskan pada kedua kurikulum tersebut menyiratkan secara jelas bahwa tujuan pembelajaran matematika dewasa ini menekankan pada kemampuan berpikir yang harus dimiliki siswa (Pepin, 2021;Safrudiannur & Rott, 2019;Wang & McDougall, 2019). Dengan memiliki kemampuan berpikir, maka siswa akan lebih baik dalam memahami dan menguasai konsep-konsep matematika yang dipelajarinya (Ngilawajan, 2013).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified