Consensus-Based Public Acceptance and Mapping of Nuclear Energy Investments Using Spherical and Pythagorean Fuzzy Group Decision Making Approaches

Xie, Yizhang; Yue, Peng; Yüksel, Serhat; Dınçer, Hasan; Uluer, Gülsüm Sena; Çağlayan, Çağatay; Yi, Li

doi:10.1109/access.2020.3037344

Cited by 29 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 76 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, the sums of rows and columns (D and E) are computed using Eqs. ( 35) and ( 36) (Xie et al 2020).…”

Section: Fig 1 Membership and Non-membership Degrees Of Ifs And Pfsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Moreover, a hybrid methodology is considered in the proposed model, which contributes to the objectivity of the analysis results (Zhou et al 2020;Qiu et al 2020;Akram et al 2021a, b). Additionally, by using the DEMATEL method to weight the criteria, an impact relation map can be created (Yuan et al 2020), which provides an opportunity to a conduct causality analysis between factors (Delen et al 2020;Xie et al 2020).…”

Section: Fig 2 Algorithm Of the Hybrid Decision Support Systemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, this proposed model considers the DEMATEL approach to weigh the factors. The main advantage of this methodology over similar ones is that an impact-relation map can be constructed (Yuan et al 2020), and the causality analysis between the items can be performed (Delen et al 2020;Xie et al 2020). As the TOPSIS methodology considers the distances to both negative and positive ideal solutions (Rani et al 2020), better results can be reached (Dhiman and Deb 2020;Ziemba et al 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A hybrid heterogeneous Pythagorean fuzzy group decision modelling for crowdfunding development process pathways of fintech-based clean energy investment projects

Meng

Zhao

et al. 2021

Financ Innov

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to evaluate the crowdfunding alternatives regarding new service development process pathways of clean energy investment projects. In this framework, a new model has been generated by considering the consensus-based group decision-making with incomplete preferences, Pythagorean fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). Moreover, a comparative evaluation has been performed with Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I. Kompromisno Resenje methodology and sensitivity analysis has been made by considering 4 different cases. The main contribution is to identify appropriate crowdfunding-based funding alternatives for the improvement of the clean energy investments with a novel MCDM model. By considering the iteration technique and consensus-based analysis, the missing parts in the evaluations can be completed and opposite opinion problems can be reduced. Furthermore, with the help of hybrid MCDM model by combining DEMATEL and TOPSIS, more objective results can be reached. It is concluded that the analysis results are coherent and reliable. The findings indicate that the full launch is the most significant criterion for equity and debt-based crowdfunding alternatives. On the other side, the analysis has the highest weight for reward and donation-based alternatives whereas design is the most essential item regarding the royalty-based alternative. Additionally, it is also defined that equity-based crowdfunding alternative is the most significant for the service development process of clean energy investment projects. In this way, it will be possible to provide a continuous resource for clean energy investment projects. On the other hand, by providing financing with equity, there will be no fixed financing cost for clean energy investors. If these investors make a profit, they distribute dividends with the decision of their authorized bodies.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, the sums of rows and columns (D and E) are computed using Eqs. ( 35) and ( 36) (Xie et al 2020).…”

Section: Fig 1 Membership and Non-membership Degrees Of Ifs And Pfsmentioning

confidence: 99%