2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-16148-4_41
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consensus Graph Learning for Incomplete Multi-view Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each learned view-specific graph is constrained to have exactly c (the number of clusters) connected components so that the clustering results can be obtained without requiring any post-clustering. With the help of other views, Zhou et al 42 constructed a complete graph for each view and learned a consensus graph automatically by using each constructed view-specific graph. Zhuge et al 43 connected the processes of spectral embedding and graph completion to recover missing entries of each graph based on multiplications of a common representation matrix and corresponding view-specific representation matrix, and the p-th root is integrated to incorporate losses of multiple views, which weighs the contributions of different views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each learned view-specific graph is constrained to have exactly c (the number of clusters) connected components so that the clustering results can be obtained without requiring any post-clustering. With the help of other views, Zhou et al 42 constructed a complete graph for each view and learned a consensus graph automatically by using each constructed view-specific graph. Zhuge et al 43 connected the processes of spectral embedding and graph completion to recover missing entries of each graph based on multiplications of a common representation matrix and corresponding view-specific representation matrix, and the p-th root is integrated to incorporate losses of multiple views, which weighs the contributions of different views.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, several graph regularization approaches have been proposed to learn a global or consensus graph from multi-view data for clustering [17], [18] and semi-supervised learning [19]. They employ multi-view features to obtain a unified graph structure.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They employ multi-view features to obtain a unified graph structure. Particularly in [17], [18], the authors propose optimization problems, where single view graph representations are extracted first and then they are fused into a unified graph. In our optimization scheme, we also adopt a graph regularization approach to fit the signal representation model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing traditional incomplete multi-view clustering methods focus on using zero or mean imputation techniques to fill in incomplete information. In this way, Zhou et al [18] proposed to fill missing samples with mean eigenvalues, and then perform clustering on the filled data. However, this padding method may introduce some useless or even noisy information, resulting in poor quality of the construction graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%