Consensus or Conflict: The Dilemma of Islamic Historians

Hess, Andrew C.; Hodgson, Marshall G. S.; Lombard, Maurice; Spencer, Joan; Parry, V. J.; Yapp, M. E.; Wellhausen, Julius; Ostle, R. C.; Walzer, S. M.; Rosenthal, Franz; Marmorstein, Emile; Marmorstein, Jenny; Keddie, Nikki R.; Goodman, Lenn E.; Ḥitti, Philip K.

doi:10.2307/1864780

The American Historical Review

1976

DOI: 10.2307/1864780

|View full text |Cite

Consensus or Conflict: The Dilemma of Islamic Historians

Andrew C. Hess¹,

Marshall G. S. Hodgson²,

Maurice Lombard³

et al.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1979

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

The 1908 Young Turk Revolution: Old and New Approaches

Quataert

1979

Middle East Stud. Assoc. Bull.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In many areas of Middle East studies, revolutions—from the 8th century Abbasid to the 20th century Egyptian cases—have been treated as multidimensional phenomena, filled with actors impelled by varying, often conflicting interests and motives. Scholarship has come to perceive these revolutions as products of commingled political, intellectual, social and economic forces, and each event as the unique creation of a particular blend of the various elements. The nature of this mix, in turn, has been seen to determine the subsequent post-revolutionary behavior of the various groups in society. Yet when we focus on the case of the so-called Young Turk “Revolution” of 1908, we find that most studies have been strikingly unilinear in their analyses. The limited approach has colored our view, both of the Revolution and of subsequent events. My purpose here is to examine the historiography of the Young Turk Revolution and then to offer some possible alternative interpretations.

show abstract

The 1908 Young Turk Revolution: Old and New Approaches

Quataert

1979

Middle East Stud. Assoc. Bull.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Consensus or Conflict: The Dilemma of Islamic Historians

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

The 1908 Young Turk Revolution: Old and New Approaches

The 1908 Young Turk Revolution: Old and New Approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About