2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequence forecasting: A rational framework for predicting the consequences of approaching storms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the results largely agree with previous analyses outlined in the introduction that extreme windstorms are likely to become more frequent over the UK following the RCP8.5 scenario. Furthermore, increasing the resolution of numerical models will likely provide improved input for impact models which may be valuable for future planning of infrastructure and for continued improvements in consequence forecasting for event-response planning (Dunn et al, 2018;Wilkinson et al, 2022). Large uncertainties in the projections still exist, which include random variability of cyclones at a regional level as well as the natural variability of large-scale drivers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, the results largely agree with previous analyses outlined in the introduction that extreme windstorms are likely to become more frequent over the UK following the RCP8.5 scenario. Furthermore, increasing the resolution of numerical models will likely provide improved input for impact models which may be valuable for future planning of infrastructure and for continued improvements in consequence forecasting for event-response planning (Dunn et al, 2018;Wilkinson et al, 2022). Large uncertainties in the projections still exist, which include random variability of cyclones at a regional level as well as the natural variability of large-scale drivers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the scope of climate change impact assessments, functional damages are rarely analyzed, often just viewed as a consequence. Works related to functional damage and systemlevel loss of service, in particular, are comparatively more limited in number [17], [18]. Limiting impact assessments to the estimation of physical damages or even componentlevel functional loss overlooks the complex interdependencies of infrastructure systems [1].…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the application of a singular fragility curve is likely to be insufficient, overestimating fragility in some areas while underestimating fragility in others. Wilkinson et al (2022) present a regional analysis to develop fragility curves for specific regions, but this can potentially create difficulty in creating consistent thresholds for use and interpretation by grid operators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the energy sector is decarbonized and the dependence of society on reliable electricity grows (Jaroszweski et al, 2021), the ability to proactively anticipate these faults due to high wind gusts will be of increasing global importance. Fragility curves provide a useful means of achieving this aim by representing the likelihood of failure of a specific piece of infrastructure under a range of conditions and have been applied to electric power systems for a variety of extreme events including earthquakes (Lagos et al, 2020;Zareei et al, 2016) and windstorms (Dunn et al, 2018;Murray & Bell, 2014;Panteli et al, 2017;Wilkinson et al, 2022). Jeong and Elnashai (2007) group methods to develop fragility curves into four categories: (1) Analytical approaches which seek to use structural simulation models to reflect the likelihood of failure as used by Panteli et al (2017) and Zareei et al (2016); (2) Empirical approaches which rely on large amounts of historical failure data such as those used by Murray and Bell (2014) and Dunn et al (2018); (3) Judgemental approaches which form probabilities based on expert opinions; and (4) Hybrid approaches which seek to combine two or more approaches in an attempt to overcome the limitations of a single method ("scarcity of observational data, subjectivity of judgmental data and modeling deficiencies of analytical procedures") (Jeong & Elnashai, 2007, p. 1239.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation