2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livprodsci.2005.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of genetic selection for increased milk production in European seasonal pasture based systems of milk production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
91
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
4
91
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, milk, fat, protein, lactose and MS yield per ha has increased by 1.8%, 1.6%, 1.7%, 1.0% and 1.4% per year, respectively, from 1960s to 2000s. This increase in productivity has been reported previously and is a consequence of increased emphasis of selection for milk production, including fat and protein yield, as milk yield has been the main objective criterion for selection in most temperate countries (Miglior et al, 2005;Dillon et al, 2006). The same authors have observed that the rate of increase in milk production per cow per year since 1985 has been 193, 131, 35 and 46 kg for the United States, The Netherlands, New Zealand and Ireland, respectively, while the rate of increase was 120 kg in France (L. Delaby, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Similarly, milk, fat, protein, lactose and MS yield per ha has increased by 1.8%, 1.6%, 1.7%, 1.0% and 1.4% per year, respectively, from 1960s to 2000s. This increase in productivity has been reported previously and is a consequence of increased emphasis of selection for milk production, including fat and protein yield, as milk yield has been the main objective criterion for selection in most temperate countries (Miglior et al, 2005;Dillon et al, 2006). The same authors have observed that the rate of increase in milk production per cow per year since 1985 has been 193, 131, 35 and 46 kg for the United States, The Netherlands, New Zealand and Ireland, respectively, while the rate of increase was 120 kg in France (L. Delaby, personal communication).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Side effects of increasing milk yield per cow Loss of fertility and higher probability of the appearance of diseases are mentioned as side effects of increasing milk yield per cow in dairy farming (Lucy, 2001;Dillon et al, 2006). GHG emissions produced during the rearing phase of modelled replacement heifers contribute up to 20% of total GHG emissions from the modelled dairy farms.…”
Section: Allocation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management and production assumptions for the modelled PU are shown in Table 1. Higher replacement rates for higher yielding dairy cows were assumed, in order to account for the higher replacement rate reported for Zehetmeier, Baudracco, Hoffmann and Heissenhuber systems with higher milk yield per cow per year (Lucy, 2001;Dillon et al, 2006). Age at first calving was set at 27 months for all replacement heifers included in the model.…”
Section: Model Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the past two decades, interest has shifted towards the role of feed intake and its relationship with energy balance (EB), health and fertility. This shift in interest arose from the fact that current genetic selection for yield increases feed intake, but also results in a more negative energy balance (NEB) and more body tissue mobilisation during lactation (see Veerkamp et al, 1993;Dillon et al, 2006). As demonstrated by the size and direction of the genetic correlation between milk yield and feed intake and by the negative genetic correlation -E-mail: Roel.Veerkamp@wur.nl between milk yield and measures of EB, live-weight (LW; change) and body condition score (BCS; Veerkamp et al, 2003), the expected correlated response in feed intake from selection on yield alone cannot cover the extra requirements needed for the increased yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%