2008
DOI: 10.1665/1082-6467-17.2.283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of individual size variation for survival of an insect herbivore: an analytical model and experimental field testing using the red-legged grasshopper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Body size and mass in crickets are positively correlated with fecundity and desiccation resistance [ 23 , 51 , 59 ]. Further, female crickets prefer larger males [ 60 , 61 ], probably because they are better competitors and tend to occupy territories with plentiful resources and favorable environmental conditions, such as grasshoppers [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Body size and mass in crickets are positively correlated with fecundity and desiccation resistance [ 23 , 51 , 59 ]. Further, female crickets prefer larger males [ 60 , 61 ], probably because they are better competitors and tend to occupy territories with plentiful resources and favorable environmental conditions, such as grasshoppers [ 62 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both theoretical and empirical approaches have shown how the distribution of individual traits can change depending on resource levels and population density (Grimm and Uchmanski 2002;Ozgul et al 2009) and how population dynamics in turn are influenced by trait dynamics (Uchmanski 2000;Ovadia and Schmitz 2002;Ozgul et al 2010). Theoretical approaches have provided evaluation of model predictions with and without consideration of individual variability (Grimm and Uchmanski 2002;Pfister and Stevens 2003), and a few exemplary studies have empirically investigated demographic consequences of individual variation in traits (Ovadia and Schmitz 2002;Filin et al 2008). Although individual variation has been shown to influence several aspects of population dynamics, the ability of a trait-based demographic approach to predict a population's response to perturbations has yet to be tested empirically.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier PSPMs accounted for between-cohort but not within-cohort variation in individual traits, which is ubiquitous in nature. Individual heterogeneity is one of the defining features of individualbased modeling approaches (IBMs; Grimm and Railsback 2005), which can easily be tailored to incorporate individual traits as state variables (e.g., Grimm and Uchmanski 2002;Ovadia and Schmitz 2002;Filin et al 2008). Recent individual-based adaptations of PSPMs (de Roos et al 2009;Gonzalez-Suarez et al 2011) relax the strong assumption of the PSPM framework by allowing withincohort variation in individual traits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of this in grasshoppers are the relationship between body size and fecundity [7] or survival [9]. Thus, analyzing large-scale geographic variation of body size in different organisms is of importance in order to understand both the abiotic and biotic factors that may modify it through several mechanisms and the ecological and evolutionary consequences of this variation [2,[10][11][12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%