2005
DOI: 10.1002/smj.445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of measurement problems in strategic management research: the case of Amihud and Lev

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Eisenhardt (1989) show that CEO duality increase asymmetric information between manager and the board which accentuate agency problems between insiders and outsiders. Boyd et al (2005) note that CEO duality tears the equilibrium power between CEO and the board which reduce the board's controlling efficiency. Kim et al (2009) show that in the case of unrelated industries, CEO duality and corporate diversification are associated positively.…”
Section: The Ceo Duality and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eisenhardt (1989) show that CEO duality increase asymmetric information between manager and the board which accentuate agency problems between insiders and outsiders. Boyd et al (2005) note that CEO duality tears the equilibrium power between CEO and the board which reduce the board's controlling efficiency. Kim et al (2009) show that in the case of unrelated industries, CEO duality and corporate diversification are associated positively.…”
Section: The Ceo Duality and Diversificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The top indexed companies taken from the Australian Stock Exchange (AXS), Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) and Karachi Stock Exchange (KSE) in the proportions of 25%, 37.5% and 37.5% respectively in the total sample, as in Table 1 below. Accounting measures have the limitation that they are somewhat open to manipulation by management, so multiple performance measures were used because of the inherent limitations in any single financial measurement [Boyd, Gove, and Hitt 2005]. Based on suggestions in previous research, multiple measures produce a more accurate description of performance [Rechner and Dalton 1991].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unreliable measures often result conflicting findings across comparable studies because of measurement errors (Boyd et al, 2005), which may hinder the smooth advancement of knowledge. Crook et al (2010) find that though the results are satisfactory regarding internal reliability, very few of the entrepreneurship studies reported regarding inter-respondent reliability.…”
Section: Reliability and Validity Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%