2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2007.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consequences of pig domestication for skeletal muscle growth and cellularity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
57
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly as Bogucka et al (2008), we observed a significantly higher proportion of type I myofibers in 3-week, 7-month and 2-year-old WP than in DP. This is in contradiction with the findings of other studies, in which no differences in the proportion of type I myofibers were detected (Losel et al, 2013) or type I myofibers were even more numerous in the longissimus dorsi muscle of DP than of WP (Muller et al, 2002;Rehfeldt et al, 2008). The detection of type I myofibers is reliable, regardless of whether immunohistochemistry or myosin ATPase-based methods are used.…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly as Bogucka et al (2008), we observed a significantly higher proportion of type I myofibers in 3-week, 7-month and 2-year-old WP than in DP. This is in contradiction with the findings of other studies, in which no differences in the proportion of type I myofibers were detected (Losel et al, 2013) or type I myofibers were even more numerous in the longissimus dorsi muscle of DP than of WP (Muller et al, 2002;Rehfeldt et al, 2008). The detection of type I myofibers is reliable, regardless of whether immunohistochemistry or myosin ATPase-based methods are used.…”
contrasting
confidence: 94%
“…Morphological and physiological properties of myofibers, a major constituent of skeletal muscle, may underlay the antagonism between growth performance and meat quality traits (Rehfeldt et al, 2008). Therefore, the aim of this study was to further elucidate the influence of domestication on the differentiation of myofiber types.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a loss of fibres after weaning in carnitine-treated pigs seems very unlikely (Rehfeldt et al, 1987;Bé rard et al, 2011), the compensation in total fibre number is suggested to result from a different trajectory of the earlypostnatal increase in fibre number in control and carnitinesupplemented piglets. An early-postnatal increase in total fibre number in pig muscle has been reported to occur in ST muscle cross sections at the mid-belly level (Rehfeldt et al, 2000 and2008b;Bé rard et al, 2011) and can be attributed to two mechanisms. On the one hand, the prenatal formation of primary and secondary myofibres (Wigmore and Stickland, 1983;Lefaucheur et al, 1995) is followed by a third wave of myofibre hyperplasia after birth and gives rise to new fibres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the majority of muscle fibres is formed prenatally in the pig (Wigmore and Stickland, 1983;Rehfeldt et al, 2000), a postnatal increase in total fibre number in the cross-section of m. semitendinosus (ST) and m. psoas major has been observed in domestic and wild pigs (Rehfeldt et al, 1987 and2008b;Bé rard et al, 2011). This increase could be associated with the early-postnatal appearance of a third generation of fibres (Mascarello et al, 1992;Lefaucheur et al, 1995) or elongation of existing short fibres (Bérard et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ruusunen and Puolanne (2004) and Rehfeldt et al (2008) compared growth and muscular properties of wild and domestic pigs (DP). Despite higher weight, muscles of DP exhibited lower numbers of myofibres and were less mature at birth, which was associated with a lower proliferation rate of derived myoblasts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%