2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1608724113
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation law for self-paced movements

Abstract: Optimal control models of biological movements introduce external task factors to specify the pace of movements. Here, we present the dual to the principle of optimality based on a conserved quantity, called “drive,” that represents the influence of internal motivation level on movement pace. Optimal control and drive conservation provide equivalent descriptions for the regularities observed within individual movements. For regularities across movements, drive conservation predicts a previously unidentified sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…they both signal the general availability of reward. This should result in an increase in the perceived opportunity cost of time and increased motivational drive, whether the source is external [ 10 ] or internal [ 50 ]. However, if such a common mechanism was limited in scalability, increasing opportunity cost would not have an unlimited effect on behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…they both signal the general availability of reward. This should result in an increase in the perceived opportunity cost of time and increased motivational drive, whether the source is external [ 10 ] or internal [ 50 ]. However, if such a common mechanism was limited in scalability, increasing opportunity cost would not have an unlimited effect on behaviour.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seminal deterministic optimal control (DOC) models can predict the shape of average arm trajectories corresponding to a given movement duration [17,18,49,50]. The movement duration can be determined in ad hoc ways such as by setting the task's effort [51][52][53] but DOC does not account for the trial-by-trial variability of human movement. Assuming signaldependent motor noise, SOOC models have been proposed to extend deterministic models and predict a movement duration corresponding to a fixed level of endpoint variance (e.g.…”
Section: How Existing Models Predict Movement Timing and Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way, the least-action principle of physics (and chemistry) acts like a piece of computing machinery that solves an ill-posed inverse problem of perception—(see Horn and Schunck, 1981 ; Weiss et al, 2002 ; Stocker, 2006 ; Dold et al, 2019 ; Greydanus et al, 2019 ; Lutter et al, 2019 ). It is important to point out that once a least-action has been adopted in models of vision and cognition, a few authors have already made the next step and used Noether's theorem to explain vision (Weiss, 1997 ) and motor control (Huh and Sejnowski, 2016 ).…”
Section: Perception Viewed As An Inverse Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%