2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservation tillage (CT) for climate-smart sustainable intensification: Assessing the impact of CT on soil organic carbon accumulation, greenhouse gas emission and water footprint of wheat cultivation in Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Transport and transport exercise in the sector of agriculture, such as elevating crops, animal husbandry, forest ranging, fishing, sources of pollution of the environment leads to the emission of CO2 (Gomez et al, 2020). Machines used in agriculture, for instance land tilling, yielding crops, and groundwater pumping, emit CO2 (Rahman et al, 2021). Transport of agricultural products, livestock and fishing, forest timber, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transport and transport exercise in the sector of agriculture, such as elevating crops, animal husbandry, forest ranging, fishing, sources of pollution of the environment leads to the emission of CO2 (Gomez et al, 2020). Machines used in agriculture, for instance land tilling, yielding crops, and groundwater pumping, emit CO2 (Rahman et al, 2021). Transport of agricultural products, livestock and fishing, forest timber, etc.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conservation tillage had 26%−31% less global warming potential (Mangalassery et al, 2014) and stored more carbon in the soil than conventional tillage (Yadav et al, 2020). Furthermore, conservational tillage practices have considerably less water footprint than conventional tillage systems (Rahman et al, 2021). The crop diversification portfolio has numerous positive outlooks over monocropping.…”
Section: Policy Implications Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other particularities and solutions were highlighted by the researchers, such as the presented in Table 4. [119] Fodder banks [120] Fermentation of agricultural waste [121] Models to identify tomato ripeness [122] No-tillage, waste management, and agricultural diversification [123] Conservation agriculture [124] Based on conservation tillage systems [125] Nanotechnology [126] Including for carbon management in soil [127] Drought-tolerant seeds [128] Integrated pest control, combined crop-animal agriculture and organic composting [129] Fertilizer trees and shrubs [130] Terrace landscapes [131] Annual crops planted with coconuts [132] Agroforestry structures [133] Microalgae [134] Dambo cultivation [135] Valorisation of agro-food byproducts [136] Traditional agriculture [137] Integrated farming systems [138] '4R' approach (right source, right rate, right time, right place) [139] Agronomic rotations and cover cropping [140] "Positive Deviance" (identifying practices from farms with higher performance) [141] Genetic strategies [142] Vertical farming [143] In the cities [144] Crop residues management through principles of bioeconomy [145] Certification strategies…”
Section: Farming Systems and Crop Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%