2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.05.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative model reduction for finite-volume models

Abstract: This work proposes a method for model reduction of finite-volume models that guarantees the resulting reduced-order model is conservative, thereby preserving the structure intrinsic to finite-volume discretizations. The proposed reduced-order models associate with optimization problems characterized by a minimum-residual objective function and nonlinear equality constraints that explicitly enforce conservation over subdomains. Conservative Galerkin projection arises from formulating this optimization problem a… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
97
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, physical constraints have started to be used in standard (ie, without ROM) LES closure modeling (see, eg, the works of Duraisamy et al and Wang et al). Finally, physical constraints have also been used in standard ROM (ie, without closure modeling) . The CDDC‐ROM proposed in this paper uses physical constraints to improve the physical accuracy of the ROM closure model (ie, the Correction term in the DDC‐ROM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, physical constraints have started to be used in standard (ie, without ROM) LES closure modeling (see, eg, the works of Duraisamy et al and Wang et al). Finally, physical constraints have also been used in standard ROM (ie, without closure modeling) . The CDDC‐ROM proposed in this paper uses physical constraints to improve the physical accuracy of the ROM closure model (ie, the Correction term in the DDC‐ROM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, physical constraints have also been used in standard ROM (ie, without closure modeling). [45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52] The CDDC-ROM proposed in this paper uses physical constraints to improve the physical accuracy of the ROM closure model (ie, the Correction term in the DDC-ROM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, many projection-based dynamics learning methods perform projection using a minimum-residual formulation [7] that does not preclude the violation of important physical properties such as conservation. To mitigate this issue, recent work has proposed a projection technique that explicitly enforces conservation over subdomains by adopting a constrained least-squares formulation to define the projection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of model order reduction of elliptic problems (1) by the reduced Basis (RB) method, it is sometimes desirable to obtain a locally conservative flux (4), for instance for a posteriori error estimation [1] or in the context of flow problems [2]. However, this is not straightforward for RB solutions (5), even if the underlying scheme (2) yields locally conservative approximations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not straightforward for RB solutions (5), even if the underlying scheme (2) yields locally conservative approximations. While [3] ensure global mass conservation and [4] ensure mass conservation with respect to few subdomains, we are not aware of any work ensuring local mass conservation with respect to the underlying grid in the RB context. The present work closes this gap.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%