2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2005.03.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conservative space-time mesh refinement methods for the FDTD solution of Maxwell’s equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simplified version will be presented in the next section too. A very elegant solution with Lagrange multipliers has been proposed [7] and enhanced [1], which leads however to the solution of a fixed linear system at each iteration. Another totally explicit solution was built, which seems to be only consistent in average and then first-order accurate [25].…”
Section: Symplectic Schemes For Hamiltonian Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simplified version will be presented in the next section too. A very elegant solution with Lagrange multipliers has been proposed [7] and enhanced [1], which leads however to the solution of a fixed linear system at each iteration. Another totally explicit solution was built, which seems to be only consistent in average and then first-order accurate [25].…”
Section: Symplectic Schemes For Hamiltonian Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, for the transient solution of hyperbolic conservation laws where several algorithms have been proposed [8,26], it is not easy to verify a maximum principle and to maintain high order accuracy. In our context, where a non-dissipative spatial discretization is used in order to achieve exact energy conservation, efficient local time-stepping is also difficult to built: a solution for wave propagation with Lagrange multipliers has been proposed [7] and enhanced [1], which leads however to the solution of a fixed, interface-sized linear system at each time iteration. Another totally explicit solution was built, which seems to be only consistent in average and then first-order accurate [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [13] Collino, Fouquet and Joly proposed an LTS method for the wave equation in first-order form, which conserves a discrete energy yet requires every time-step the solution of a linear system on the interface between the coarse and the fine mesh. It was analyzed in [14,15] and later extended to elastodynamics [16] and Maxwell's equations [17]. By combining a symplectic integrator with a DG discretization of Maxwell's equations in first-order form, Piperno [18] proposed a second-order explicit local time-stepping scheme, which also conserves a discrete energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If no analytical solution is known, local refinement [4] seems like an attractive option were it not that this usually requires a significantly reduced time step (though several "multirate" refinement techniques have been proposed [5], [6] and appendix and several references in [4]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%