“…Nevertheless, skeptics continue to deny that meaningful ideological differences in existential motivation exist, claiming instead that liberals and conservatives are equally fearful and that exposure to highly threatening circumstances produces symmetrical (but opposite) effects of "ideological intensification" (e.g., Anson et al, 2009;Castano et al, 2011;Chambers, Schlenker, & Collisson, 2013;Charney, 2014;Greenberg & Jonas, 2003;Huddy & Feldman, 2011;Proulx et al, 2012). In contrast, a theory of political ideology as motivated social cognition proposed by Jost et al (2003) suggests that there is an "elective affinity" between existential needs to reduce threat and politically conservative rhetoric and ideology, insofar as the latter tends to offer relatively simple, decisive, rigid, orderly, familiar, conventional, efficient, black-and-white, hierarchical, and authoritative solutions to social problems, challenges, and opportunities.…”