2022
DOI: 10.1111/eva.13379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Conserved molecular pathways underlying biting in two divergent mosquito genera

Abstract: Mosquitoes transmit a wide variety of devastating pathogens when they bite vertebrate hosts and feed on their blood. However, three entire mosquito genera and many individual species in other genera have evolved a nonbiting life history in which blood is not required to produce eggs. Our long-term goal is to develop novel interventions that reduce or eliminate the biting behavior in vector mosquitoes. A previous study used biting and nonbiting populations of a nonvector mosquito, Wyeomyia smithii, as a model t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
7
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of these eight miRNAs, six have validated functions or predicted mRNA targets related to energy utilization, reproduction, and immunity. Differences in the expression of miRNAs promoting energy utilization in the head tissues of biting Pipiens relative to non-biting Molestus are consistent with previous studies at the mRNA level of these same tissues [14], as well as studies of the head tissues of A. aegypti before attaining competency for blood feeding [4]. Taken together, these results emphasize the dramatic energetic investment that is required for blood-feeding mosquitoes to locate a blood-meal host and acquire blood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Of these eight miRNAs, six have validated functions or predicted mRNA targets related to energy utilization, reproduction, and immunity. Differences in the expression of miRNAs promoting energy utilization in the head tissues of biting Pipiens relative to non-biting Molestus are consistent with previous studies at the mRNA level of these same tissues [14], as well as studies of the head tissues of A. aegypti before attaining competency for blood feeding [4]. Taken together, these results emphasize the dramatic energetic investment that is required for blood-feeding mosquitoes to locate a blood-meal host and acquire blood.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These results imply increased Tret1 protein levels in non-biting Molestus relative to biting Pipiens. Taken together with our previous mRNA results showing upregulation of fructose and mannose metabolism in non-biting Molestus [14] and the established role of sugar feeding in supporting autogenous reproduction [16], these results imply that non-biting Molestus prioritize sugar metabolism to generate sufficient energy reserves to reproduce without a blood meal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A positive correlation between mosquito larval abundance and hydrolysis of l ‐phenylalanine suggests that W. smithii larvae may affect amino acid turnover in pitcher communities, particularly of a metabolically expensive aromatic essential metabolite for which bacteria are frequently auxotrophic (D'Souza et al., 2014; Zengler & Zaramela, 2018). In addition to the potential implications for the composition and underlying interactions of pitcher‐associated communities, phenylalanine, along with tyrosine, has previously been identified as a key metabolite in the metabolism of non‐blood‐feeding relative to blood‐feeding subspecies of the common house mosquito, Culex pipiens (Beintema et al., 1994; Siperstein et al., 2022; Wheeler & Buck, 1996). Whether phenylalanine hydrolysis is also important for the maintenance of a non‐blood‐feeding life history in W. smithii warrants further study, especially in light of results from a previous study that failed to detect differences in phenylalanine metabolism between blood‐feeding and non‐blood‐feeding W. smithii populations (Bradshaw et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%