2018
DOI: 10.22201/fcpys.24484938e.2018.75.64813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CONSIDERACIONES METODOLÓGICAS PARA LA INVESTIGACIÓN CON PRIVADOS DE LIBERTAD: REFLEXIONES DE UNA EXPERIENCIA EN CÁRCELES DE Costa Rica

Abstract: <p>En este artículo reflexiono sobre el procedimiento metodológico que diseñé para encarar los desafíos que me impuso un trabajo de campo que realicé en dos prisiones de Costa Rica durante los meses de abril y agosto de 2006. En concreto, me interesa llamar la atención sobre las medidas tomadas para garantizar la seguridad de quienes participaron en el estudio, así como aquellas tendientes a evitar la reproducción de estereotipos y prácticas de poder sobre los entrevistados y, además destacar la utilidad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When I became aware of these omissions, I carefully reiterated the voluntary nature of their participation and the absence of any impact -either negative or positive. I also pointed out that information provided would be anonymous and confidential (Jewkes, 2011;Calderón, 2018). Despite these instructions, some interviews were difficult.…”
Section: Contacts With Prisoners and Performance Of Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When I became aware of these omissions, I carefully reiterated the voluntary nature of their participation and the absence of any impact -either negative or positive. I also pointed out that information provided would be anonymous and confidential (Jewkes, 2011;Calderón, 2018). Despite these instructions, some interviews were difficult.…”
Section: Contacts With Prisoners and Performance Of Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reflections on methodological and ethical issues in the social sciences, and specifically in criminology and prison research have been gradually emerging in recent decades (Bosworth et al, 2005;Calderón, 2018;Crewe, 2014;Downing;Polzer;Levan, 2013;Duarte;Gomes, 2017;Gelsthorpe, 1990;Jewkes, 2011Jewkes, , 2014Liebling, 2001;Lumsden;Winter, 2014;Myers, 2003;Phillips;Earle, 2010;Piacentini, 2013;Schlosser, 2008). However, few writings are found about these issues in the academic literature, which is partially explained by the traditional predominance of quantitative methodology, which is often considered the most valid and rigorous, and by an approach that sacralizes a particular concept of objectivity and distance to the object as key aspects of scientific research (Flavin, 2001;Gelsthorpe, 1990;Jewkes, 2011;Renzetti, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%