2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113642
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consideration of Clinician and Researcher Opinions on the Parameters of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Disorder Diagnostic Criteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although we could not assess whether raising the cutoff‐point could have improved clinical utility by increasing specificity as previously suggested (Buelens et al, 2020 ; Muehlenkamp & Brausch, 2016 ), we did find that situating recency within the last month considerably improved the true negative rate. While the trade‐off in sensitivity might be unacceptable for more than 5 days self‐injured (i.e., 50% true positive rate), our results support suggestions from Ammerman et al ( 2019 ; 2021 ) that at least 1 day injured in the last month could balance sensitivity (i.e., 87%) and specificity (i.e., 77%) more appropriately than only considering days self‐injured within the last year. Besides better accounting for individuals' lived experience and their perception of their behavior, assessing self‐injury within the last month may also reduce recall failures associated with long periods of time passing between assessment and NSSI (Borschmann et al, 2017 ; Daukantaité et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although we could not assess whether raising the cutoff‐point could have improved clinical utility by increasing specificity as previously suggested (Buelens et al, 2020 ; Muehlenkamp & Brausch, 2016 ), we did find that situating recency within the last month considerably improved the true negative rate. While the trade‐off in sensitivity might be unacceptable for more than 5 days self‐injured (i.e., 50% true positive rate), our results support suggestions from Ammerman et al ( 2019 ; 2021 ) that at least 1 day injured in the last month could balance sensitivity (i.e., 87%) and specificity (i.e., 77%) more appropriately than only considering days self‐injured within the last year. Besides better accounting for individuals' lived experience and their perception of their behavior, assessing self‐injury within the last month may also reduce recall failures associated with long periods of time passing between assessment and NSSI (Borschmann et al, 2017 ; Daukantaité et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%