2022
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2010-6_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations for Generating Humanized Mouse Models to Test Efficacy of Antisense Oligonucleotides

Abstract: Over the last decades, animal models have become increasingly important in therapeutic drug development and assessment. The use of these models, mainly mice and rats, allow evaluating drugs in the real-organism environment and context. However, several molecular therapeutic approaches are sequence-dependent, and therefore, the humanization of such models is required to assess the efficacy. The generation of genetically modified humanized mouse models is often an expensive and laborious process that may not alw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To overcome this hurdle, a humanized rodent model where the target gene is replaced or partially replaced by the human counterpart could be used for the in vivo validation of the human NAT sequence. Deep phenotyping is required to assess whether the humanization recapitulates the disease phenotype or maintains the function of the gene [ 26 , 52 , 53 ]. Second to mouse models, zebrafish is also reported in our survey, likely due to the convenient genetic modification, well characterized development, high capacity, and rapid turnaround as a conventional experimental animal model [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this hurdle, a humanized rodent model where the target gene is replaced or partially replaced by the human counterpart could be used for the in vivo validation of the human NAT sequence. Deep phenotyping is required to assess whether the humanization recapitulates the disease phenotype or maintains the function of the gene [ 26 , 52 , 53 ]. Second to mouse models, zebrafish is also reported in our survey, likely due to the convenient genetic modification, well characterized development, high capacity, and rapid turnaround as a conventional experimental animal model [ 54 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Personalized medicine holds a huge promise for severe genetic diseases ( Kim et al, 2019 ; Wang et al, 2020 ; Diener et al, 2022 ), and requires the appropriate animal models ( Kalmykov et al, 2018 ; Aartsma-Rus and van Putten, 2019 ; Polikarpova et al, 2022 ; Vázquez-Domínguez and Garanto, 2022 ). Sequence-specific RNA-based drugs, such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and RNAi therapeutics ( Zhu et al, 2022 ; Zogg et al, 2022 ), are currently in development as a new generation of medicine to treat dominant neurological disorders such as Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinocerebellar ataxia, and several others ( Zhao et al, 2017 ; Iannitti et al, 2018 ; Miniarikova et al, 2018 ; Southwell et al, 2018 ; Martier et al, 2019 ; Aimiuwu et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence-specific RNA-based drugs, such as antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and RNAi therapeutics ( Zhu et al, 2022 ; Zogg et al, 2022 ), are currently in development as a new generation of medicine to treat dominant neurological disorders such as Huntington’s disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, spinocerebellar ataxia, and several others ( Zhao et al, 2017 ; Iannitti et al, 2018 ; Miniarikova et al, 2018 ; Southwell et al, 2018 ; Martier et al, 2019 ; Aimiuwu et al, 2020 ). Humanized mouse models are in demand to facilitate safety and efficacy studies of such innovative classes of drugs ( Nair et al, 2019 ; Zhu et al, 2019 ; Vázquez-Domínguez and Garanto, 2022 ). For instance, several humanized mouse models of Huntington’s disease are currently available for the preclinical evaluation of SNP-dependent ASO and RNAi-based gene therapy ( Miniarikova et al, 2018 ; Southwell et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, most of our sequences of interest are not completely conserved among different species. Therefore, the molecules designed to target a human sequence cannot be directly assessed in an animal model [ 55 ]. This means that for in vivo assessments, it is not usually possible to use exactly the same SSOs or U1snRNA sequences that are used for human cells.…”
Section: Splicing: How It Work and How It Can Be Modulatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative would be to generate humanized animal models, an approach that is both time- and resource-consuming and may contribute to a substantial increase in the drug development time while requiring additional funding. Furthermore, the generation of a humanized animal model for every mutation that needs to be targeted is neither feasible nor ethical and may not always recapitulate the human molecular and/or physiological phenotypes [ 54 , 55 ].…”
Section: Splicing: How It Work and How It Can Be Modulatedmentioning
confidence: 99%