IECEC-97 Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Intersociety Energy Conversion Engineering Conference (Cat. No.97CH6203)
DOI: 10.1109/iecec.1997.656758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations in the estimation of costs and benefits of industrial energy efficiency projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples in literature and practice show that although the manufacturing sector has made continuous improvements in energy efficiency over the last years, "the economic energy efficiency potential in the industrial sector is far from being exhausted" [6]. Moreover, some researchers in the field of energy efficiency suggest that there are productivity benefits that can be associated with energy efficiency improvement measures [7,8,9]. These non-energy benefits could be, for example, lower maintenance costs, increased production yield, safer working conditions and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples in literature and practice show that although the manufacturing sector has made continuous improvements in energy efficiency over the last years, "the economic energy efficiency potential in the industrial sector is far from being exhausted" [6]. Moreover, some researchers in the field of energy efficiency suggest that there are productivity benefits that can be associated with energy efficiency improvement measures [7,8,9]. These non-energy benefits could be, for example, lower maintenance costs, increased production yield, safer working conditions and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study of process industries by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory's identified a number of these technology opportunities, especially in the heavy industries ). More broadly, a series of papers have indicated that including energy savings alone does not account for the full economic returns to industry when evaluating the cost-effectiveness of energy efficiency improvements (Finman and Laitner, 2001;Elliott, et al, 1997;and Sullivan, et al, 1997).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, it will be the least costly alternative in the market that provides the energy service at the highest energy efficiency and, consequently, with the lowest energy consumption. 5 See, for example, Short et al (1995), Elliot et al (1997), Wroblewski et al (1997), Mahlia et al (2002), Lee et al (2003), EPA (2008), Nikolaidis et al (2009), McNeil andBojda (2012), and the Technical Support Documents the U.S. Department of Energy publishes as part of its energy efficiency standard rulemakings. (https://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/ appliance_standards/standards_test_procedures.html)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%