Maritime Archaeology 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0084-5_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Considerations of Remote Sensing Limitations to Submerged Historical Site Survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the line spacing utilized for this survey was less than the standard 165 feet (50 meters) used by the Minerals Management Service, Outer Continental Shelf, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers marine remote sensing surveys, as well as less than the 100 feet (30 meters) recommended by the National Park Service (Murphy and Saltus 1990). However, tighter lane spacing provides better bathymetric data of any exposed structure.…”
Section: Chapter 7 Results Of Remote Sensing Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the line spacing utilized for this survey was less than the standard 165 feet (50 meters) used by the Minerals Management Service, Outer Continental Shelf, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers marine remote sensing surveys, as well as less than the 100 feet (30 meters) recommended by the National Park Service (Murphy and Saltus 1990). However, tighter lane spacing provides better bathymetric data of any exposed structure.…”
Section: Chapter 7 Results Of Remote Sensing Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%